> >...if I need a Ph.D. and five feet of shelf space for the manuals
> >required to make it run, I don't want it on my network...
>
That's what separates the "system engineers" from the "skr1pt k1d33s". ;-)
I don't like needing 30 books just to make a program work, but most of the
time that isn'
You're right, I'd have torn out all my hair and gone back to teaching
things like the psychology of complex musical compositions. :-)
=)
Amanda
"Derek J. Balling" wrote:
> >...if I need a Ph.D. and five feet of shelf space for the manuals
> >required to make it run, I don't want it on my netwo
>...if I need a Ph.D. and five feet of shelf space for the manuals
>required to make it run, I don't want it on my network...
Man, you would have never made it in the days of VAXen and the big
{blue,orange,grey} walls ;-)
D
--
+-+-
On Thursday 25 October 2001 13:48, Amanda wrote:
> My fundamental issue with sendmail is that it's not intuitive.
Sendmail is not intuitive. Very true, and a very good argument against its
use. If you don't mind, I'll translate that statement into "Sendmail is
overly complex and convuluted."
to install software, my
> experience is
> that if you solely rely on the availability of an RPM, then you may be
> missing out on other alternatives.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jon Carnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> S
experience is
that if you solely rely on the availability of an RPM, then you may be
missing out on other alternatives.
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Carnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:24 AM
Subject: [Mailman-Users
On Thursday 25 October 2001 10:48, Timothy Brier wrote:
> I couldn't agree more. I was using the RPMs from RedHat with Sendmail.
> It was taking about 30 minutes to deliver 500 messages.
>
> I downloaded and installed Postfix (not the RPM) and watched the time
> drop to 1 minute and 45 seconds.
