Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail performance

Knabe, Troy wrote: >So that works, but I am still seeing 7 minutes where the messages are staying >in the sendmail queue. Sendmail is configured to re-run the queue every 5 >minutes so the extra 2 is about right for how long it takes to go through the >other messages in the queue first. But wh

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail performance

Knabe, Troy wrote: So that works, but I am still seeing 7 minutes where the messages are staying in the sendmail queue. Sendmail is configured to re-run the queue every 5 minutes so the extra 2 is about right for how long it takes to go through the other messages in the queue first. But why does

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail performance

So that works, but I am still seeing 7 minutes where the messages are staying in the sendmail queue. Sendmail is configured to re-run the queue every 5 minutes so the extra 2 is about right for how long it takes to go through the other messages in the queue first. But why does the message hit t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail performance

Knabe, Troy wrote: So my sendmail start script included /usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -q5m So I made it /usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -ODeliveryMode=defer \ -ODaemonPortOptions=Name=MSA,Port=1313,M=E,Addr=127.0.0.1 End original message. - Put the original line ba

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail performance

So my sendmail start script included /usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -q5m So I made it /usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -ODeliveryMode=defer \ -ODaemonPortOptions=Name=MSA,Port=1313,M=E,Addr=127.0.0.1 On 8/8/08 12:04 PM, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Knabe, Troy wrote: > >You can do this withou

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail performance

Knabe, Troy wrote: > >You can do this without modifying your sendmail files at all. Instead, in your >startup script, add: > >/usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -ODeliveryMode=defer \ >-ODaemonPortOptions=Name=MSA,Port=,M=E,Addr=127.0.0.1 Did you ADD that, or replace something wi

[Mailman-Users] Sendmail performance

I am quite certain that this is the answer to my issue, as I see the Mailman messages being routed through my spam filter 2x as it enters/leaves queues. But when I tried to impliment it sendmail quit listening on port 25. Anyone else experience issues with this solution? Any suggestions? Tha

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman

At 11:53 PM +0100 2004/01/05, Dr. M.C. Koops wrote: I have no experience with smtp, but lots of people tell me that it is really hard to configure sendmail. Not really. Using the m4 package, it's pretty easy to build a sendmail.mc file that can be compiled into a suitable sendmail.cf. Many s

[Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman

Hi Graham, At http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2002-May/019621.html I found your post on SMTP. I have a similar problem to the one you replied to. i just installed Linux RedHat 9.0, and I want to use sendmail. The emails do not leave the server though, but they are queued. I have n

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail performance

In message so spake "David Gibbs" (david): > I've got an instance of sendmail listening specifically on 127.0.0.1 ... can > anyone point me to some information on how to disable synchronous dns > verification in sendmail? The TUNING file in the sendmail dire

[Mailman-Users] Sendmail performance

Folks: The README.SENDMAIL has the following statement ... > Since Mailman usually connects via localhost (i.e. 127.0.0.1) to > the SMTP port of Sendmail, you should be sure to configure > Sendmail /not/ to do DNS verification synchronously for > localhost connections. I've got an instance of se

RE: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman

Title: RE: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman Yah, I have done that.  Decent performance gain.  However I still have to use DNS for sendmail itself (don't want an open relay), and I can't run Bind on the box locally so I guess I just have to live with it. >

RE: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman

Title: RE: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman Thanks for the answer.  By default in Slackware, the sendmail queue was running every 15 minutes, so I set it to 2 minutes.  That seems to have sped it up quite a bit.  Now if I could just solve the DNS problem without running Bind

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman

On May 3, 2002 12:18 pm, Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC DIN-PACS wrote: > As of today, I am no longer getting failures in the smtp-error logs, > however it seems that incoming messages are parsed to mailman, then > queued for 10 to 40 minutes where they just wait. No errors, no > timeouts, they just wai

RE: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman

;[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman I have had an ongoing problem with qrunner being extremely slow, so I tried some of the suggestions in the faq. I made the following changes: I added the followind to my sendmail startup     /us

[Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman

Title: Sendmail Performance with mailman I have had an ongoing problem with qrunner being extremely slow, so I tried some of the suggestions in the faq. I made the following changes: I added the followind to my sendmail startup     /usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -ODeliveryMode=defer \