Re: [Mailman-Users] Sibling List Problem [cPanel]

2010-01-17 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jan 17, 2010, at 3:36 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > We'll still need users willing to piss off cPanel and their ISPs by > invoking their GPL/Affero rights. I don't think switching licenses is feasible. MM3 is GPLv3. I'd much rather try to get cPanel to engage more with the Mailman commun

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sibling List Problem [cPanel]

2010-01-17 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Adam McGreggor writes: > "Change the licence to one that requires external modifications to > be disclosed." > It needn't be restrospective, MM3 might be an ideal opportunity. Look at the GNU Affero GPL and see if that does what you want. I don't think anything stronger than that would fly (

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sibling List Problem [cPanel]

2010-01-16 Thread Adam McGreggor
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 09:24:59AM -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Does anyone know how to get cPanel's attention so they might fix this? I've resisted saying it for some time, but here goes. "Change the licence to one that requires external modifications to be disclosed." That way 'we' mig

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sibling List Problem [cPanel]

2010-01-16 Thread Mark Sapiro
Mark Sapiro wrote: > >In cPanel regular_include_lists and regular_exclude_lists are broken. >For regular_include_lists used in lieu of an umbrella as you are >doing, I think you can use the cPanel munged listname; e.g., > >child1_example@example.com >etc. > >and it will work as long as the list