Re: [Mailman-Users] Small issue (hopefully) with upgrading/migrating from v2.1.9 to v2.1.18-1

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 01/14/2015 09:38 PM, Chris Nulk wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >> > >> DRY > >> > > > > ​DRY? > > > > ​ Well, I try not to but sometimes it doesn't wo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Small issue (hopefully) with upgrading/migrating from v2.1.9 to v2.1.18-1

On 01/14/2015 09:38 PM, Chris Nulk wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >> DRY >> > > ​DRY? -- Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dyl

Re: [Mailman-Users] Small issue (hopefully) with upgrading/migrating from v2.1.9 to v2.1.18-1

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 01/14/2015 04:11 PM, Chris Nulk wrote: > > > > I have run into a small problem. One of the customizations I did was to > > ​.​ > > > > > I think that addtional check is preventing my additional > > attribute/property from accepting li

Re: [Mailman-Users] Small issue (hopefully) with upgrading/migrating from v2.1.9 to v2.1.18-1

On 01/14/2015 04:11 PM, Chris Nulk wrote: > > I have run into a small problem. One of the customizations I did was to > added an additional attribute to the sender filters similar to the > *_these_nonmembers fields. On the v2.1.9 installation, my customization > will accept individual email addr

[Mailman-Users] Small issue (hopefully) with upgrading/migrating from v2.1.9 to v2.1.18-1

Hello, In a previous message, I mentioned my plans on upgrading/migrating a customized v2.1.9 installation to a customized v2.1.18-1 installation. I have analyzed the changes needed and made to the v2.1.18-1 installation. I have run into a small problem. One of the customizations I did was