Re: [Mailman-Users] Spam check and bounced email's body

2006-03-03 Thread Oliver Schulze L.
Hi Mark, I understand. The solution I'm looking is to hack the code to not send the body of the differed/rejected email. It would be nice to hace and option for this, since anti-spam software get installed more and more every day. Thanks for your reply, Oliver Mark Sapiro wrote: Oliver

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spam check and bounced email's body

2006-03-03 Thread Oliver Schulze L.
Hi Patrick, seems a nice solution, will give it a try. Cheers, Oliver Patrick Bogen wrote: If you're using sendmail, I have a solution that I implemented that seems to work quite well: Put together a script (e.g., an init script in /etc/init.d, on Debian) that will run the following on

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spam check and bounced email's body

2006-03-03 Thread Oliver Schulze L.
Sorry about posting my email again. I received an email from the list moderator saying that my email was rejected so I assumed it was rejected. I didn't saw my email until I sended it again to the list :( I should double check next time ;) Regards, Oliver Mark Sapiro wrote: Oliver Schulze

[Mailman-Users] Spam check and bounced email's body

2006-02-28 Thread Oliver Schulze L.
(I do not found this problem on the archives) Hi, I use spamassassin to filter spam. So I configured a rule in mailman that detect the string {Spam} in the subject of the email and then defer the email. The problem is that mailman sent to owner of the list the email that is spam with the body of

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spam check and bounced email's body

2006-02-28 Thread Mark Sapiro
Oliver Schulze L.wrote: My question is: how can I configure mailman to not sent the body of the email in the notification to the owner of the list? I think we did the best we can with this last week in the thread you started at

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spam check and bounced email's body

2006-02-23 Thread Brad Knowles
At 11:39 PM -0600 2006-02-22, Patrick Bogen wrote: This basically starts a sendmail daemon that listens only to localhost, and bypasses all filters and stuff to stick whatever it receives directly in the outgoing queue. If the mail to the admin is being delivered locally, this means it

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spam check and bounced email's body

2006-02-23 Thread Patrick Bogen
It probably is in the FAQ. I promise I didn't come up with this; I got it from somewhere else. :) On 2/23/06, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 11:39 PM -0600 2006-02-22, Patrick Bogen wrote: This basically starts a sendmail daemon that listens only to localhost, and bypasses all

[Mailman-Users] Spam check and bounced email's body

2006-02-22 Thread Oliver Schulze L.
Hi, I use spamassassin to filter spam. So I configured a rule in mailman that detect the string {Spam} in the subject of the email and then defer the email. The problem is that mailman sent to owner of the list the email that is spam with the body of the email. So, spamassassin detects the body

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spam check and bounced email's body

2006-02-22 Thread Mark Sapiro
Oliver Schulze L. wrote: My question is: how can I configure mailman to not sent the body of the email in the notification to the owner of the list? You can turn off admin_immed_notify so the admin/moderator only gets a daily summary of held posts. There's no other option for it. If the daily

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spam check and bounced email's body

2006-02-22 Thread Oliver Schulze L.
Hi Mark, ok, I will try to find a solution in my spam filter. Will not scan if the email is relayed by mailman. But still will have problem if the owner's mail server have a spam solution. Maybe my mailman email server can get black listed for sending spam :( I think its a nice feature request

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spam check and bounced email's body

2006-02-22 Thread Patrick Bogen
If you're using sendmail, I have a solution that I implemented that seems to work quite well: Put together a script (e.g., an init script in /etc/init.d, on Debian) that will run the following on startup: sendmail OPTIONS=-bd -ODeliveryMode=defer