Re: [Mailman-Users] Testing STEALTH_MODE = 1

2013-01-11 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jan 11, 2013, at 01:14 PM, Tom Skelley wrote: >Out of interested, is there an ETA on a production release of Mailman 3.x ? At this point, we're mostly trying to get the web ui (Postorius) feature compatible with Mailman 2.1. We're also working on the new archiver (Hyperkitty). I think the co

Re: [Mailman-Users] Testing STEALTH_MODE = 1

2013-01-11 Thread Tom Skelley
Thanks, that was exactly what I needed! The version of Mailman is a bit later than 2.1.6, but it's still pretty old. Have to be a bit cagey as it's not my install. I suspect that whoever turned off stealth mode to test and then never turned it back on again. Out of interested, is there an ETA on a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Testing STEALTH_MODE = 1

2013-01-10 Thread Mark Sapiro
Tom Skelley wrote: > >I've found that setting STEALTH_MODE = 1 in mailman/scripts/driver should >fix the problem, but I need to test it. Is there a way to force an error >through the web interface? What Mailman version are you running? STEALTH_MODE has been set to 1 by default in scripts/driver s

[Mailman-Users] Testing STEALTH_MODE = 1

2013-01-10 Thread Tom Skelley
Hi All, A bit of an odd question this one. I'm new to Mailman, and one of my customers has just had an external audit. As part of the audit an advisory was given that too much information was given when an Apache query was executed. This turns out to be from the /mailman/create script. I've foun