Re: [Mailman-Users] The economics of spam and OT:

2008-12-25 Thread Alex
Well, Comcast just blocked port 25 at my house and required to use port 587 for outgoing mail. I guess charging money per email is next? port 25 is dead dropped to my non-comcast server as well. Also comcast rep writes: I have included the current list of blocked ports for you below: 67 68 135

Re: [Mailman-Users] The economics of spam and OT:

2008-12-24 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Alex writes: > Well, Comcast just blocked port 25 at my house and required to use port 587 > for outgoing mail. I guess charging money per email is next? No, why do you think that follows? Blocking port 25 simply means that you can't spam without going through Comcast. If they thought that c