On 8/25/06 8:07 AM, "Dragon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Security for one. Much of the impetus for releasing later versions in
> the 2.1.X branch was for that reason.
I don't know what, if anything, RedHat is doing about backporting the
security changes. For things in general, they are pretty g
Allan Trick wrote:
>At 09:18 AM 8/25/2006, Barry Finkel wrote:
>
> >I have seen many posts on this list from people who are running
> >2.1.5 (or earlier). I am wondering why someone would recently
> >upgrade to 2.1.5 instead of to 2.1.8, which is the current release?
>
>Barry,
>
>I know one reason
Barry Finkel wrote:
> > Our Mailman was recently upgraded to 2.1.5.
>
>I have seen many posts on this list from people who are running 2.1.5
>(or earlier). I am wondering why someone would recently upgrade to
>2.1.5 instead of to 2.1.8, which is the current release?
End original m
At 09:18 AM 8/25/2006, Barry Finkel wrote:
>I have seen many posts on this list from people who are running
>2.1.5 (or earlier). I am wondering why someone would recently
>upgrade to 2.1.5 instead of to 2.1.8, which is the current release?
Barry,
I know one reason we don't upgrade every time
> Our Mailman was recently upgraded to 2.1.5.
I have seen many posts on this list from people who are running 2.1.5
(or earlier). I am wondering why someone would recently upgrade to
2.1.5 instead of to 2.1.8, which is the current release?
-
