Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

2005-07-29 Thread Elizabeth Lear
Thanks so much for all of the help and information. I will try using MIME digests first. If things don't work for the subscribers, I can try Mark's code suggestion. ...eliz -- Children are made up of genetics, blind luck, and the stories you tell

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

2005-07-28 Thread Brad Knowles
At 8:03 PM -0600 2005-07-28, Elizabeth Lear wrote: > Ah, thanks. Before I give up completely, can you say whether scrubber > can be hacked out without breaking things, or is it too integral to > the code? I believe that omitting or hacking Scrubber.py is likely to lead to behaviour t

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

2005-07-28 Thread Mark Sapiro
Tokio Kikuchi wrote: > >Elizabeth Lear wrote: > >>>Sorry, but use of Mailman.Handlers.Scrubber is hard coded in >>>ToDigest.py. I should have make it configurable like it was for the >>>archiver. :-( >> >> >> Ah, thanks. Before I give up completely, can you say whether scrubber >> can be hac

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

2005-07-28 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
Hi, Elizabeth Lear wrote: >>Sorry, but use of Mailman.Handlers.Scrubber is hard coded in >>ToDigest.py. I should have make it configurable like it was for the >>archiver. :-( > > > Ah, thanks. Before I give up completely, can you say whether scrubber > can be hacked out without breaking th

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

2005-07-28 Thread Elizabeth Lear
> Sorry, but use of Mailman.Handlers.Scrubber is hard coded in > ToDigest.py. I should have make it configurable like it was for the > archiver. :-( Ah, thanks. Before I give up completely, can you say whether scrubber can be hacked out without breaking things, or is it too integral to the co

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

2005-07-28 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
Hi Mark, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Elizabeth Lear wrote: > >>Is there any way to configure it to just pass the attachments through >>rather than trying to save them on the server? > > > You could remove Scrubber from the pipeline, Sorry, but use of Mailman.Handlers.Scrubber is hard coded in ToDi

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

2005-07-28 Thread Mark Sapiro
Elizabeth Lear wrote: > >Is there any way to configure it to just pass the attachments through >rather than trying to save them on the server? You could remove Scrubber from the pipeline, but I don't think you want to do that because I think the MIME structure of the message with attachments will

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

2005-07-28 Thread Elizabeth Lear
Hmm, thanks. Is there any way to configure it to just pass the attachments through rather than trying to save them on the server? ...eliz -- Children are made up of genetics, blind luck, and the stories you tell them. - The Flying Ks ---

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

2005-07-27 Thread Mark Sapiro
Elizabeth Lear wrote: > >A list on my site is not using content filtering, and has set digests >to plain mode. I've double-checked that all digest subscribers are >also set to plain mode. This is irrelevant to the following. Digest plain or mime only governs whether the individual messages in t

[Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

2005-07-27 Thread Elizabeth Lear
Hi - My apologies if this has been covered or is something obvious, but I haven't been able to find a reference to it in the manuals and I've never run across this before. A list on my site is not using content filtering, and has set digests to plain mode. I've double-checked that all digest sub