Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination

On 06/21/2016 09:59 AM, Scott Thompson wrote: > > How do I allow these through so I dont have to keep approving them? > This is the email I get with pending requests: > > Cause: Message has implicit destination > > > I want to allow those through automatically. Set Privacy options... -> Reci

[Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination

Hello all. How do I allow these through so I dont have to keep approving them? This is the email I get with pending requests: Cause: Message has implicit destination I want to allow those through automatically. Thanks! Scott -- Mailman

Re: [Mailman-Users] implicit destination

On 4/13/16 7:30 AM, Larry Turnbull wrote: > > On one of my mailman lists a subscriber's messages keeps getting held for > moderator approval with the implicit destination error. This occurs because the list is not explicitly addressed in a To: or Cc: header of the post. E.g., the post is sent as

[Mailman-Users] implicit destination

Hi all: On one of my mailman lists a subscriber's messages keeps getting held for moderator approval with the implicit destination error. I went in to the privacy recipient settings and set the ceiling to 0. Are there any other settings I can adjust to keep this error from occurring?

Re: [Mailman-Users] implicit destination error.

On 7/14/15 5:12 PM, Adam Morris wrote: > > is there a way to set up mailman so if people send messages to one of my > lists and put the address in the cc field it is accepted instead of me > as owner having to approve the message? If the list address is in Cc:, the message will not be held for i

[Mailman-Users] implicit destination error.

Hi all, is there a way to set up mailman so if people send messages to one of my lists and put the address in the cc field it is accepted instead of me as owner having to approve the message? -- Adam Morris email: a...@damorris.com -

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit destination

Mark Sapiro writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >But does Mailman have to treat this as an implicit address? Mark was generous. Yes, it does. Mailman is doing the right thing. Your user's system is broken. Just because people rarely die from misconfigured mail programs doesn't mean they

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit destination

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >But does Mailman have to treat this as an implicit address? Of course >'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is not literally exactly the same as [EMAIL PROTECTED] , >but the >list address is explicitly included within the quotes. Could a future version >of Mailman >allow for this and a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit destination

iginal Message - From: "Steve Burling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mailman Users" Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 4:22 PM Subject: [Mailman-Users] Implicit destination > One of our lists has someone post to it whose mail is held, with the error: > > Blind

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit destination

Barry Finkel wrote: >Steve Burling wrote: >>> >>>But as near as I can tell, she *is* putting the list address in the To: >>>field, it's just been munged (presumably by Micro$oft LookOut) to have >>>quotes in funny places. Here's what the To: field looks like from the >>>listname.mbox file (edi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit destination

Steve Burling wrote: >> >>But as near as I can tell, she *is* putting the list address in the To: >>field, it's just been munged (presumably by Micro$oft LookOut) to have >>quotes in funny places. Here's what the To: field looks like from the >>listname.mbox file (edited to protect the innocent

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit destination

Steve Burling wrote: > >But as near as I can tell, she *is* putting the list address in the To: >field, it's just been munged (presumably by Micro$oft LookOut) to have >quotes in funny places. Here's what the To: field looks like from the >listname.mbox file (edited to protect the innocent): >

[Mailman-Users] Implicit destination

One of our lists has someone post to it whose mail is held, with the error: Blind carbon copies or other implicit destinations are not allowed. Try reposting your message by explicitly including the list address in the To: or Cc: fields. But as near as I can tell, she *is* putting the list addres

Re: [Mailman-Users] implicit destination

On 7/14/06, Ki Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should the files in $prefix/cgi-bin be owned by root:mailman? > > Shouldn't it be mailman:mailman? This depends on how you ran the configure script, if I understand correctly. Why was this question attached to a thread about Implicit Destination er

Re: [Mailman-Users] implicit destination

Should the files in $prefix/cgi-bin be owned by root:mailman? Shouldn't it be mailman:mailman? -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bi

Re: [Mailman-Users] implicit destination

In a flurry of recycled electrons, Dr. John Caccavale wrote: > I just cannot seem to get a workable solution to a problem I am having > with Mailman. Although the list is set up to be unmoderated, I am still > getting message to "accept or deny" a message from members. The reason > is always the sa

[Mailman-Users] implicit destination

I just cannot seem to get a workable solution to a problem I am having with Mailman. Although the list is set up to be unmoderated, I am still getting message to "accept or deny" a message from members. The reason is always the same: "implicit destination". I have tried everything but nothing wor

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit destination

Lawrence Bowie wrote: >I have a message in the vette directory labeled: Do you mean the vette log? > Message has implicit destination > >The user whom sent it subscribes to the list. How do I resolve? The message was held for "implicit destination". If it hasn't already been acted upon

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit destination

Lawrence Bowie wrote: > I have a message in the vette directory labeled: > > Message has implicit destination > > The user whom sent it subscribes to the list. How do I resolve? > > Thanks, > > LDB > > -- > Mailman-Users mailing list >

[Mailman-Users] Implicit destination

I have a message in the vette directory labeled: Message has implicit destination The user whom sent it subscribes to the list. How do I resolve? Thanks, LDB -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.or

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit destination

It also that some listserves won't respond when their address is listed bcc: . It's a total pain that a sender who prefers addressing to lists of bcc: addresses has to persuade the owner of some mailman lists to reconfigure so as to accept posting to their list under bcc; the alternative is to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit destination

Bob Bales wrote: >What does it mean when a message is kocked back due to: > >>Cause: Message has implicit destination It means that Privacy options...->Recipient filters->require_explicit_destination is Yes and neither the list posting address nor any acceptable_aliases were found in the To: or

[Mailman-Users] implicit destination

Hello Sorry about the previous message. I just found the explanation of "message has implicit destination" in the FAQ document. Thanks anyway. Joe -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination

On 5/4/2005 9:44, "chardlist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a MM 2.1.5 server with 40 lists that are operating perfectly with the > exception of 1 user and it's got me stumped. She is writing to the list and > placing the list address in the To: field, yet all of her messages are being > he

[Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination

I have a MM 2.1.5 server with 40 lists that are operating perfectly with the exception of 1 user and it's got me stumped. She is writing to the list and placing the list address in the To: field, yet all of her messages are being held for moderator approval citing "Message has implicit" destinatio

Re: [Mailman-Users] "implicit destination" anyway to turn off thischeck on incoming?

On Oct 11, 2004, at 2:05 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: Chad Leigh wrote: Not related to my own installations of mailman, but I run a few lists on an ISP I have an account at (for historical reasons). The lists were originally majordomo lists and when they moved to Mailman the hostname changed from lists.

Re: [Mailman-Users] "implicit destination" anyway to turn off thischeck on incoming?

Chad Leigh wrote: >Not related to my own installations of mailman, but I run a few lists >on an ISP I have an account at (for historical reasons). The lists >were originally majordomo lists and when they moved to Mailman the >hostname changed from lists.domain.tld to mailman.domain.tld . And

[Mailman-Users] "implicit destination" anyway to turn off this check on incoming?

Not related to my own installations of mailman, but I run a few lists on an ISP I have an account at (for historical reasons). The lists were originally majordomo lists and when they moved to Mailman the hostname changed from lists.domain.tld to mailman.domain.tld . And then a forwarding link

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit destination

John W. Baxter wrote: > >Other adverse consequences depend on the population of list members. > >One of them: we have some who seem to think that CC'ing to all their >friends and BCC'ing the list is somehow clever. What it does, of course, is >reveal a bunch of addresses to the list members...the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit destination

On 9/14/2004 8:40, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In my case of a list with 300 members and 0 to 20 posts per day and a > web published address, the spam all gets caught in the "non-member" > filter. Only a couple of member posts have gotten caught in the > "implicit destination" filte

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit destination

Mário Filipe wrote: > >I can i configure a list to receive messages with implicit destination, >so that they wont bounce for approval? > >Is it enough to set "require_explicit_destination" to no? Apart from the >spam are there any other consequences to such a configuration? Yes, it should be enoug

[Mailman-Users] Implicit destination

Hello I can i configure a list to receive messages with implicit destination, so that they wont bounce for approval? Is it enough to set "require_explicit_destination" to no? Apart from the spam are there any other consequences to such a configuration? Thanks -- Mario Filipe [E

Re: [Mailman-Users] implicit destination

At 3:23 PM -0500 2004-07-08, Young, Darren wrote: Can anyone explain this message: List:[EMAIL PROTECTED] From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (no subject) Reason: Message has implicit destination See

Re: [Mailman-Users] implicit destination

On Jul 8, 2004, at 1:23 PM, Young, Darren wrote: Can anyone explain this message: List:[EMAIL PROTECTED] From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (no subject) Reason: Message has implicit destination Thanks. Someone BCC'd the list instead of listing it on the To or CC lines. It gets

Re: [Mailman-Users] implicit destination

On Jul 8, 2004, at 4:23 PM, Young, Darren wrote: Can anyone explain this message: List:[EMAIL PROTECTED] From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (no subject) Reason: Message has implicit destination See: -Jeff -

[Mailman-Users] implicit destination

Can anyone explain this message: List:[EMAIL PROTECTED] From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (no subject) Reason: Message has implicit destination Thanks. Darren Young Senior UNIX Administrator University of Chicago Graduate School of Business [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: 773-70

Re: [Mailman-Users] implicit destination problem

Thanks for your reply. Turns out that the problem is that mailman (at least 2.0.x) silently converts the address to lower case before doing the comparision. Using ib instead of IB made it work. On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 17:47:41 +0900, Jim Tittsler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 3, 2004, at 02:

Re: [Mailman-Users] implicit destination problem

On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:26:28 -0500, Dan Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jun 2, 2004, at 1:22 PM, Lonni J Friedman wrote: > > The admin of the list isn't me, i just admin the physical box, and the > > list admin is afraid of spam, so he wants to have tight control over > > what can get

Re: [Mailman-Users] implicit destination problem

On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:11:08 -0500, Dan Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 2, 2004, at 12:50 PM, Lonni J Friedman wrote: > > The problem is that all the mail for the list is > > always held for approval because of the implicit destination. > > > > Don't know about the % question, but w

[Mailman-Users] implicit destination problem

Greetings, I've got a mailman list (version 2.0.14) behind a firewall. As a result, anyone trying to send mail to that list sends it to an external email address which is of the format: [EMAIL PROTECTED] That address then gets translated internally and forwards the mail to the mailman list. The

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination

Implicit Destination means the list address is not present in either to To: or CC: lines in a posting. It typically means that someone BCC'd the list. It's forbidden because it's a common spam technique.. - Mark On Nov 13, 2003, at 3:18 AM, Rejean Proulx wrote: What does implicit destinati

[Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination

What does implicit destination mean? I want these posts so what can I do as administrator to let them through without approval. What does implicit destination mean? How do I stop this. I want these posts. There must be something I can do as administrator. - Original Message - From: <

[Mailman-Users] implicit destination error

Hello I get the following error: Blind carbon copies or other implicit destinations are not allowed. Try reposting your message by explicitly including the list address in the To: or Cc: fields. But when I look at the headers the list name is in the to: field. Any ideas Received: from mt

Re: [Mailman-Users] implicit destination - help

On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 12:26:31PM -0600, Terry Davis wrote: > For compatibility reasons, I created virtuser entries for all of my > lists. There are some old email addresses that people use to use > for the list functions. For example: [EMAIL PROTECTED] has > a virtuser of [EMAIL PROTECTED] I

[Mailman-Users] implicit destination - help

For compatibility reasons, I created virtuser entries for all of my lists. There are some old email addresses that people use to use for the list functions. For example: [EMAIL PROTECTED] has a virtuser of [EMAIL PROTECTED] If I send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it will require approval. W

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination?

On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 11:01:57AM +0700, Armanto Prasetyo wrote: > I have install Mailman Mailing List in my web site. But why, if member post > their message, it always wait for admin's approval? The reason is "Message > has implicit destination". What does this message means? My mailing list >

[Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination?

Helo, I have install Mailman Mailing List in my web site. But why, if member post their message, it always wait for admin's approval? The reason is "Message has implicit destination". What does this message means? My mailing list name is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for your help, ap. www.armanto

[Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination?

Helo,   I have install Mailman Mailing List in my web site. But why, if member post their message, it always wait for admin's approval? The reason is "Message has implicit destination". What does this message means? My mailing list name is mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Thanks for your help, ap.

[Mailman-Users] Implicit destination

I recently set up several lists and the messages are requiring me to approve them because they have "implicit destination".  Any idea what I can change in my configuration to take care of this problem???   I'm on digest version so please be sure your reply goes to my email address (alone or

Re: [Mailman-Users] implicit destination check

Can you "rewrite" the addresses on your MTA ? Maybe it's a solution. Phil. On Sat, 24 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hello mailman-users, > > We have setup a mailman mailinglist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Works fine. > We want the users to approach this list by the name > [EMAIL PROTECTED] whic

[Mailman-Users] implicit destination check

Hello mailman-users, We have setup a mailman mailinglist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Works fine. We want the users to approach this list by the name [EMAIL PROTECTED] which forwards to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailman however always checks the To: address and asks the administrator for approval because of the im

[Mailman-Users] Implicit destination ?

Hi Can anyone point me at the right area to stop this happening; I'm running Mailman V2.0.1 on a virtual host and have just set up a list called "Test". Having subscribed to the list, I then posted a test message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is the explicit address for the list or I believe it is!

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination

At 07:07 PM 1/2/01, Dan Mick wrote: >??? "Implicit destination" means, as has been said, "the list address is >not mentioned >in To: or Cc:"; the *number* of recipients doesn't affect and isn't >affected by >the *content* of recipients. No, this has nothing to do with the problem of >seeing me

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination

> | > I think I found a solution, but wanted to check with the list to see if I am > | > correct. > | > I was poking around the excerpts and found that people were sending messages > | > to my list "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with addresses such as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]; > | > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PR

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination

Dan Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Douglas Munoz wrote: | > | > I think I found a solution, but wanted to check with the list to see if I am | > correct. | > I was poking around the excerpts and found that people were sending messages | > to my list "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with addresses such as

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination

Douglas Munoz wrote: > > I think I found a solution, but wanted to check with the list to see if I am > correct. > I was poking around the excerpts and found that people were sending messages > to my list "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with addresses such as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL

RE: [Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination

I think I found a solution, but wanted to check with the list to see if I am correct. I was poking around the excerpts and found that people were sending messages to my list "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with addresses such as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; etc.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination

[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > "Implicit" is a standard english word that is in general use and is > defined in typical dictionaries. It also happens to be used correctly > by Mailman. You might want to have a look at this message http://www.exim.org/pipermail/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-2710/01

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination

On Sun, 31 Dec 2000 18:43:32 -0800 (PST) Roger B A Klorese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Dan Mick wrote: >> This means the message has an implicit destination. > Does this term have a standardized or well-understood meaning > outside of Mailman? If not, "list posting addres

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination

On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Dan Mick wrote: > This means the message has an implicit destination. Does this term have a standardized or well-understood meaning outside of Mailman? If not, "list posting address does not appear in To: or CC: headers" would be a far more useful message. -- ROGER B.A. K

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination

Douglas Munoz wrote: > > I am running a very small, un-moderated list for the internal staff of my > company. It is basically set up to allow non-members (job seekers) to post > messages (resumes) to list members (HR). > > Every couple of days I will get notification that a message requires >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination

"Douglas Munoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I am running a very small, un-moderated list for the internal staff of my | company. It is basically set up to allow non-members (job seekers) to post | messages (resumes) to list members (HR). | | Every couple of days I will get notification that a

[Mailman-Users] Implicit Destination

I am running a very small, un-moderated list for the internal staff of my company. It is basically set up to allow non-members (job seekers) to post messages (resumes) to list members (HR). Every couple of days I will get notification that a message requires administrative review. The reason give