I recall at one point some list members saying that it was not good to put
one list as a member of another list. One of my colleagues has done this
and insists that it is easier for him because this way he doesn't have to
manage duplicate names (where names intersect lists). But of course it also
Anne Shroeder wrote:
>I recall at one point some list members saying that it was not good to put
>one list as a member of another list. One of my colleagues has done this
>and insists that it is easier for him because this way he doesn't have to
>manage duplicate names (where names intersect list