On 7/15/2004 8:16, "Bryan Fullerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You might also want to consider upgrading to 2.1.5, there have been
> many bugs fixed in the past 16 months. I've found Mailman upgrades
> within major revisions to be painless (but make sure you have backups
> anyways :).
Upgradin
On Jul 15, 2004, at 9:48 AM, Alan McKay wrote:
Update : further investigation shows it is not every user, but most
users.
And if I go into the admin interface and unsub the user then
immediately
resub them with the same address, it appears (at least at this point)
to fix the problem for that user
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:48:02 -0400, Alan McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Update : further investigation shows it is not every user, but most users.
> And if I go into the admin interface and unsub the user then immediately
> resub them with the same address, it appears (at least at this point
Update : further investigation shows it is not every user, but most users.
And if I go into the admin interface and unsub the user then immediately
resub them with the same address, it appears (at least at this point)
to fix the problem for that user.
--
http://www.bodensatz.com/
TCP/IP: telecom
Hey folks,
I did a google search first and started checking through FAQs et al
and have not found a solution to this odd problem. I've been running
Mailman for several years now and in general am an advanced UNIX
user and admin.
I have one list which for some reason thinks everyone is a non-mem
