It worked out.
If we disable personalization and footer from non-digest and digest
options..
It works fine for emails sent out from same domain users. Solution was
provided on the following list..cross-posting it for everyone's benefit.
--
bob 001 wrote:
After upgrading to mailman 2.1.10, we were hoping for resolving the issue of
stripped keys.
Although keys are not longer stripped, yahoo says domainkeys=fail (bad sig)
and gmail says dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify)
Please note that, one to one email works fine and yahoo
Hello Mark,
Thanks so much for the response and getting involved.
Actually, we need keys so that yahoo doesn't consider emails as spam. That
was the main purpose of upgrading to 2.1.10 version of mailman.
Any kind of customization possible? Any insight would be of a great help.
- Regards,
Bob.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Bob001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Mark,
Thanks so much for the response and getting involved.
Actually, we need keys so that yahoo doesn't consider emails as spam. That
was the main purpose of upgrading to 2.1.10 version of mailman.
Any kind of
ah...i see. Thanks Jim for clarification.
So, how you all are exactly achieving post-signing of messages after
REMOVE_DKIM_HEADERS=Yes?
Any suggestions?
We are on postfix and dkimproxy with mailman.
Do we have any documentation on what changes should be done on
postfix/dkimproxy side for
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Bob001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, how you all are exactly achieving post-signing of messages after
REMOVE_DKIM_HEADERS=Yes?
I no longer am. :-) When I was, I was using Sendmail and dk-filter.
BUT, in the end I determined that it was (IMHO) a waste of
Bob001 wrote:
So, how you all are exactly achieving post-signing of messages after
REMOVE_DKIM_HEADERS=Yes?
That would be done in your MTA. Mailman has no involvement with this process.
Do we have any documentation on what changes should be done on
postfix/dkimproxy side for post-signing?
