> "ADC" == Andrew D Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ADC> So, if I understand this correctly, if ArchRunner is the
ADC> first named qrunner (the default), it will have to complete
ADC> its run before an other qrunner will be able to process their
ADC> queues. Is this correct
To quote from bin/qrunner:
"Each named runner class is run in round-robin fashion. In other words, the
first named runner is run to consume all the files currently in its
directory. When that qrunner is done, the next one is run to consume all
the
files in /its/ directory, and so on. The numbe
Doesn't look like it helps when the backlog is associated with only one
particular high volume list, as it seems (by looking at the /locks
directory) that only one qrunner can operate on a given list at a time.
The other ArchRunner is basically idle. However, it might help if the
qrunner tasks
I recently upgraded from mailman 2.0.12 to 2.1b3 and am quite pleased with
the new qrunner setup (among other things). We have one particularly high
volume list with very bursty postings (since the main poster is scripting
postings). In mailman 2.0.12 we'd often have hundreds of files stuck in
