Re: [Mailman-Users] not really an umbrella?

2008-01-02 Thread Mark Sapiro
Brad Knowles wrote: >On 12/31/07, Gruver, Sandi wrote: > >> How can I set up a new list that sends to multiple existing lists - but >> only sends one message to each person - even if the person is a member >> of multiple lists? >> >> a. LSOFT calls this a "superlist" >> >> b.Can "Mail

Re: [Mailman-Users] not really an umbrella?

2007-12-31 Thread Brad Knowles
On 12/31/07, Gruver, Sandi wrote: > How can I set up a new list that sends to multiple existing lists - but > only sends one message to each person - even if the person is a member > of multiple lists? > > a. LSOFT calls this a "superlist" > > b.Can "Mailman" do this? Not directly, n

[Mailman-Users] not really an umbrella?

2007-12-31 Thread Gruver, Sandi
Mailman 2.1.5 on RedHat Linux - How can I set up a new list that sends to multiple existing lists - but only sends one message to each person - even if the person is a member of multiple lists? a. LSOFT calls this a "superlist" b.Can "Mailman" do this? c. In this case, we ha