On 12/13/2013 07:55 AM, Christopher Adams wrote:
>
> I queried my MTA log for the message ID and only came up with 8 out of
> 66 addresses. These were logged as sent. I assumed that the
> bounces/undeliverables would also show up with the same message ID. Am I
> mistaken? Am I not looking for the
Thank you all for your replies.
I queried my MTA log for the message ID and only came up with 8 out of 66
addresses. These were logged as sent. I assumed that the
bounces/undeliverables would also show up with the same message ID. Am I
mistaken? Am I not looking for the right info in the MTA log?
On 12/12/2013 06:41 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Christopher Adams writes:
>
> > So, I assumed that smtp-failure.log would show which addresses were not
> > sent to. I don't think that is what it is for.
>
> No, it shows addresses that were sent to and rejected by the remote
> SMTP server.
Christopher Adams writes:
> So, I assumed that smtp-failure.log would show which addresses were not
> sent to. I don't think that is what it is for.
No, it shows addresses that were sent to and rejected by the remote
SMTP server. MTAs have another option, which is to accept and
silently discar
On 12/12/2013 03:58 PM, Christopher Adams wrote:
> Based on the logs that I have seen, this log records messages sent to
> addresses with bad syntax. Is that all it does. I don't see many items in
> these, and with the volume of mail going through our system, I would expect
> to see more.
>
> "fa
Based on the logs that I have seen, this log records messages sent to
addresses with bad syntax. Is that all it does. I don't see many items in
these, and with the volume of mail going through our system, I would expect
to see more.
"failed with code 501: 5.1.3 Bad recipient address syntax"
A po