[Mailman-Users] Spam filtering

2010-02-17 Thread Geoff Shang
Hello, I have two spam-related questions, one relevant to Mailman and one not. Apologies for the one that isn't, but I hope you will endulge this query. A person has been spoofing Email addresses on a number of blindness-related Email lists this week. I won't go into the particulars as it's

[Mailman-Users] Spam filtering

2010-02-17 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Geoff Shang writes: > 2. One idea I came up with for rejecting spoofed mail is for the > receiving SMTP server to somehow check if the sending one is an MX for the > domain given in the From header. Are there any obvious problems with this > approach? Is anyone actually doing this? It s

[Mailman-Users] Spam filtering.

2002-04-30 Thread Feorag NicBhride
My mailing list is already set up to hold posts from non-members but I'm getting very fed up of having to manually reject spam. In particular, it's Yahoo! addresses which are the biggest sinners. Has anyone written any kind of Mailman add-on that will allow me to: * automatically reject (rather t

[Mailman-Users] spam filtering

2003-01-29 Thread Robin Rowe
By setting bounce_matching_headers I have mailman trapping some messages with content likely to be spam. This works really well, and I can approve the false positives to go through. I would like to check not just headers but the message body. There are a few phrases that would be good to catch ther

[Mailman-Users] spam filtering?

2003-06-27 Thread Jeff Warnica
One would beleive, according to the front page of list.org, that mailman has integrated spam filters. Reading through the documentation and a bit of the source Im not quite sure how that is defined. Years ago I asked what "hooks for external (web) archivers" meant and was told that you can set up

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spam filtering

2010-02-17 Thread Larry Stone
On 2/17/10 7:56 AM, Geoff Shang at ge...@quitelikely.com wrote: > 1. It's possible to use an IP address to block(at least temporarily) > these messages. If I put this IP address into a Mailman spam filter, will > this be checked *before* checking whether or not the person is a member of > the li

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spam filtering

2010-02-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Larry Stone wrote: >On 2/17/10 7:56 AM, Geoff Shang at ge...@quitelikely.com wrote: > >> 1. It's possible to use an IP address to block(at least temporarily) >> these messages. If I put this IP address into a Mailman spam filter, will >> this be checked *before* checking whether or not the perso

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spam filtering

2010-02-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >Geoff Shang writes: > > > 2. One idea I came up with for rejecting spoofed mail is for the > > receiving SMTP server to somehow check if the sending one is an MX for the > > domain given in the From header. Are there any obvious problems with this > > approach? Is

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spam filtering

2010-02-17 Thread Rob MacGregor
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 15:23, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Geoff Shang writes: > > It is being done, although not via the MX for the reasons Larry Stone > gives.  What you're looking for is call "SPF" or "DKIM" (these are > actually two different protocols, and I think with the standardization >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spam filtering

2010-02-17 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Rob MacGregor writes: > That would be a surprise to the SPF folks, and the steady progression > of folks who're implementing it ;) Over the years a lot of things have been surprises to the SPF folks. I'm sorry for the misinformation, but the SPF promoters have been guilty of "excessive optimism

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spam filtering

2010-02-17 Thread Brad Knowles
On Feb 17, 2010, at 8:35 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >> SPF and DKIM solve 2 different parts of the problem of forged emails. >> Neither provides complete coverage, together they work well. > > Please explain. AFAICR, neither works very well with mailing lists > because they're both designed

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spam filtering

2010-02-18 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Brad Knowles writes: > IMO, Mailman should not re-sign. If there was anything that would > sign the outgoing messages, that would be the MTA and not Mailman. But isn't that the problem? In the situation these methods are designed for, the MTA is signing mail for a trusted party, presumably a

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering

2003-01-29 Thread Jon Carnes
Front-end your mailing lists with a procmail filter that uses SpamAssassin. On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 12:00, Robin Rowe wrote: > By setting bounce_matching_headers I have mailman trapping some messages > with content likely to be spam. This works really well, and I can approve > the false positives to

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering

2003-01-29 Thread Robin Rowe
Jon, > Front-end your mailing lists with a procmail filter that uses > SpamAssassin. Thanks, but as I said, I'm configuring mailman on a SourceForge-hosted mailing list. Installing SpamAssassin there is not within my power. Can anyone answer my question as asked? Is it possible to use the mailma

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering

2003-01-29 Thread alex wetmore
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Robin Rowe wrote: > Jon, > > Front-end your mailing lists with a procmail filter that uses > > SpamAssassin. > > Thanks, but as I said, I'm configuring mailman on a SourceForge-hosted > mailing list. Installing SpamAssassin there is not within my power. > > Can anyone answer my

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering

2003-01-29 Thread Robin Rowe
Alex, > If you automatically reject any email which isn't from list members then > you'll probably find 99.9% of your SPAM go away. Thanks, but I already do that. Can anyone answer my question as asked? Is it possible to use the mailman spam filtering capabilities on message bodies as well as

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering

2003-01-29 Thread Jon Carnes
Let me speak more clearly to you: No. - Original Message - From: "Robin Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mailman users Mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:47 PM Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering > Jon, > &

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering

2003-01-29 Thread Tom Neff
--On Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:47 PM -0800 Robin Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can anyone answer my question as asked? Is it possible to use the mailman spam filtering capabilities on message bodies as well as headers? At the risk of garnering another "that's not exactly what I asked," a 2

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering

2003-01-29 Thread Robin Rowe
Jon, > > Can anyone answer my question as asked? Is it possible to use the mailman > > spam filtering capabilities on message bodies as well as headers? > Let me speak more clearly to you: No. No you can't answer, or no it can't be done? ;-) Thanks anyway! Robin -

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering

2003-01-29 Thread Robin Rowe
Tom, > At the risk of garnering another "that's not exactly what I asked," a 2.1 > patch was posted to Sourceforge to allow this, a couple of months ago. That's a great answer. Thanks! Robin --- www.LinuxMovies.org www.Film

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering

2003-01-30 Thread Mike Noyes
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 15:47, Robin Rowe wrote: > > Front-end your mailing lists with a procmail filter that uses > > SpamAssassin. > > Thanks, but as I said, I'm configuring mailman on a SourceForge-hosted > mailing list. Installing SpamAssassin there is not within my power. > > Can anyone answer

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering

2003-01-30 Thread Mike Noyes
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 08:36, Mike Noyes wrote: > On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 15:47, Robin Rowe wrote: > > Thanks, but as I said, I'm configuring mailman on a SourceForge-hosted > > mailing list. Installing SpamAssassin there is not within my power. > > > > Can anyone answer my question as asked? Is it p

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering?

2003-06-27 Thread Saurav Pathak
Thus spake Jeff Warnica: + + What I would like is to have a simmilar setup if/when we migrate to + Mailman.. All our incomming mail is being scanned by SpamAssassin, so all + that mailman would need to do is check headers and hold for approval (or + discard as an option) messages with an

Re: [Mailman-Users] SPAM Filtering - was:(no subject)

2013-06-01 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 05/14/2013 12:43 PM, Christopher Adams wrote: > On another note, what are thoughts about utilizing SpamAssasin or other > spam software with Postfix and Mailman. It seems that a lot of the traffic > that is going through the Mailman server is spam, quite a bit which is > flagged and blocked by

[Mailman-Users] Spam filtering without intervention - is it possible?

2004-08-27 Thread Rogers, David W
I would like to eliminate my getting this email when someone sends a "spam" message to my list: As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the following mailing list posting: List:[EM

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spam filtering without intervention - is itpossible?

2004-08-27 Thread Mark Sapiro
Rogers, David W wrote: >I would like to eliminate my getting this email when someone sends a "spam" >message to my list: > > >Is it possible? I would really like these to be auto_discards. > Go to the list admin pages and select Privacy options...->Spam filters and set action to discard. -- Mar

[Mailman-Users] Spam filtering hyperlinks in body of message

2017-04-15 Thread Dang Tran
Hi all – it appears some our lists are getting spam more frequently with messages that contain hyperlinks from different members (possibly from compromised emails). Two questions please: a) Is it a good idea to block/filter out of messages that contain hyperlinks? b) If so, how can

[Mailman-Users] spam filtering messages containing certain 8 bit characters

2011-10-12 Thread William Yardley
Does Mailman base64 decode the subject before applying a regex, and if so, can I use UTF-8 character names in the regex to match various types of 8-bit characters? Say, for example, that I want to block messages with "电话卡" somewhere in the subject line. Obviously, the actual raw Subject header wi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spam filtering hyperlinks in body of message

2017-04-15 Thread Mark Sapiro
On April 14, 2017 9:56:22 AM PDT, Dang Tran wrote: > >a) Is it a good idea to block/filter out of messages that contain >hyperlinks? If you mean hyperlinks in general, I think it's a really bad idea. If you mean specific hyperlinks, e.g., with known phishing addresses, there are various

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering messages containing certain 8 bit characters

2011-10-13 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 10/12/2011 6:58 PM, William Yardley wrote: > Does Mailman base64 decode the subject before applying a regex, and if > so, can I use UTF-8 character names in the regex to match various > types of 8-bit characters? No. header filter rules regexps are matched against the raw headers. If a header