Re: [Mailman-Users] stange domain/url question

2006-07-20 Thread Anne Ramey
Mark Sapiro wrote: Anne Ramey wrote: Mark Sapiro wrote: snip Please address all questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This makes no sense. It shouldn't be -admin because that's a Mailman 2.0.x artifact, but the 'mailman' site list didn't appear until 2.1.

Re: [Mailman-Users] stange domain/url question

2006-07-20 Thread Mark Sapiro
Anne Ramey wrote: Mark Sapiro wrote: Well then is your site list named 'mailman-admin' (I assumed it was 'mailman')? No, it's names mailman. I can only assume the admin address is left over after upgrade. I've looked more deeply and found it is a bug in pre-Mailman 2.1.6 bin/newlist.

[Mailman-Users] stange domain/url question

2006-07-19 Thread Anne Ramey
Not too long ago, we switched out domain from wwwadm.mydomain.com to lists.mydomain.com. I used fix-url on all the lists, and when we create all lists now, we create then as ./newlist [EMAIL PROTECTED] But when the email is sent to the administrator for these new lists it has

Re: [Mailman-Users] stange domain/url question

2006-07-19 Thread Mark Sapiro
Anne Ramey wrote: Not too long ago, we switched out domain from wwwadm.mydomain.com to lists.mydomain.com. I used fix-url on all the lists, and when we create all lists now, we create then as ./newlist [EMAIL PROTECTED] snip you can get info about using it by sending a message with just the

Re: [Mailman-Users] stange domain/url question

2006-07-19 Thread Anne Ramey
Mark Sapiro wrote: snip Please address all questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This makes no sense. It shouldn't be -admin because that's a Mailman 2.0.x artifact, but the 'mailman' site list didn't appear until 2.1. Assuming this is a typo and is really [EMAIL PROTECTED], I proceed.

Re: [Mailman-Users] stange domain/url question

2006-07-19 Thread Mark Sapiro
Anne Ramey wrote: Mark Sapiro wrote: snip Please address all questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This makes no sense. It shouldn't be -admin because that's a Mailman 2.0.x artifact, but the 'mailman' site list didn't appear until 2.1. You are incorrect. That is not a typo...it was