Dragon writes:
> The problem is that the relevant RFC document is vague on
> how that should be handled and displayed in the MUA.
I don't see that it's vague at all. RFC 2822 provides several headers
for identifying various roles in transmitting the message on behalf of
the author. The "From
Chris Waltham wrote:
>On Mar 18, 2008, at 3:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I have the same problem with my lists.
>> Until recently we ran on an old version of Mailman.
>> Users with Outlook saw messages coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> on behalf of
>>
>>
>> Now they see messages coming f
their
> employers give them).
>
> It is small consolation to any of us that they are using an inferior
> mail system . . .
>
> Rod
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Kenneth Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 20
--On Tuesday, March 18, 2008 11:40 AM -0700 Dragon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's also limited to particular versions of Microsoft Outlook
The most recent version? If not, one can simply say "upgrade your client".
Either by going to the expensive one or switching to a free one.
(I *am* symp
: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 6:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] word "bounces" in from address
> --On Monday, March 17, 2008 1:20 PM -0400 Nick L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I know that there is a workaround to remove the word 'bounces" in the from
Kenneth Porter sent the message below at 11:15 3/18/2008:
>--On Monday, March 17, 2008 1:20 PM -0400 Nick L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
> > I know that there is a workaround to remove the word 'bounces" in the from
> > heading.
>
>Just curious, why would someone want to remove "bounces"? Is it a
--On Monday, March 17, 2008 1:20 PM -0400 Nick L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I know that there is a workaround to remove the word 'bounces" in the from
> heading.
Just curious, why would someone want to remove "bounces"? Is it a swear
word in some languages?
-
Nick L wrote:
>
>The way it would be nice if it was:
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] as the from, or even with the on behalf of, just
>not the word "bounces" in the address.
>
>
>
>Is there a way to accomplish this if you cannot have access to the mailman
>files and the hosting company won't change it?
No.
Nick L sent the message below at 10:20 3/17/2008:
>New user so be kind.
>
>I know that there is a workaround to remove the word 'bounces" in the from
>heading. When you have hosting with some companies that use virtual hosting
>plans, you cannot hack the file necessary to remove this, is there anot
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:20:41 -0400
"Nick L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know that there is a workaround to remove the word 'bounces" in the from
> heading. When you have hosting with some companies that use virtual hosting
> plans, you cannot hack the file necessary to remove this, is there ano
New user so be kind.
I know that there is a workaround to remove the word 'bounces" in the from
heading. When you have hosting with some companies that use virtual hosting
plans, you cannot hack the file necessary to remove this, is there another
way to do the following?
The way it is:
Ema
11 matches
Mail list logo
