Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman FAQ Wizard

2002-05-02 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "MN" == Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MN> OT: Will Mailman 2.1 recognize the (?!...) Python negative MN> lookahead assertion in "Hold posts with header value matching MN> a specified regexp."? It will recognize any regexp supported by the version of Python you're runn

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman FAQ Wizard

2002-05-02 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "JN" == Joern Nettingsmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Also note that the FAQ wizard is specifically intended to be >> community supported. It is maintained through an honor system, >> and the password is "Mailman". Feel free to make updates! JN> i sent a faq suggest

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman FAQ Wizard

2002-05-02 Thread Joern Nettingsmeier
"Barry A. Warsaw" wrote: > > > Also note that the FAQ wizard is specifically intended to be community > supported. It is maintained through an honor system, and the password > is "Mailman". Feel free to make updates! i sent a faq suggestion about another topic to mailman-cabal a week ago, but

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman FAQ Wizard

2002-05-02 Thread Mike Noyes
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 21:14, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > > > "MN" == Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > MN> I noticed that most of the answers in the Mailman FAQ wizard > MN> [1] assume that you have site admin access. Many of us are > MN> only list managers. Solutions to p

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman FAQ Wizard

2002-05-01 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "MN" == Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MN> I noticed that most of the answers in the Mailman FAQ wizard MN> [1] assume that you have site admin access. Many of us are MN> only list managers. Solutions to problems that work for site MN> admins may not work for list

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman FAQ Wizard

2002-05-01 Thread Mike Noyes
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 02:37, Norbert Bollow wrote: > J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Alternatively, I could set up a separate FAQ Wizard for (less > > > technical) list manager questions at listowner.org ... would this be > > > desirable? > > > > Why not simply create a less tech

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman FAQ Wizard

2002-05-01 Thread Mike Noyes
On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 20:22, J C Lawrence wrote: > On Wed, 1 May 2002 01:20:49 +0200 > Norbert Bollow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Alternatively, I could set up a separate FAQ Wizard for (less > > technical) list manager questions at listowner.org ... would this be > > desirable? > > Why no

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman FAQ Wizard

2002-05-01 Thread Norbert Bollow
J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alternatively, I could set up a separate FAQ Wizard for (less > > technical) list manager questions at listowner.org ... would this be > > desirable? > > Why not simply create a less technical section in the current FAQ? * I think that listowners and

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman FAQ Wizard

2002-04-30 Thread Dan Mick
> exception that the mail isn't going through - I get "unknown user" > error. Was I to create an account? > > because there IS no account created with the ./newlist script, newlist instructs you to add aliases to support the new list. The section of INSTALL that talks about running newlist al

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman FAQ Wizard

2002-04-30 Thread Greg Long
ard GUI installer and manager that would run in Gnome/KDE. Thanks for the help, I'm close... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of J C Lawrence Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:22 PM To: Norbert Bollow Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman FAQ Wizard

2002-04-30 Thread J C Lawrence
On Wed, 1 May 2002 01:20:49 +0200 Norbert Bollow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alternatively, I could set up a separate FAQ Wizard for (less > technical) list manager questions at listowner.org ... would this be > desirable? Why not simply create a less technical section in the current FAQ? --

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman FAQ Wizard

2002-04-30 Thread Norbert Bollow
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I noticed that most of the answers in the Mailman FAQ wizard [1] assume > that you have site admin access. Many of us are only list managers. > Solutions to problems that work for site admins may not work for list > managers. > > Is there a preferred way t