Brad Knowles wrote:
>At 1:32 AM -0600 2004-09-17, Franco, Ruben wrote:
>
>> All the examples I have seen have "mail/wrapper" instead of "mail/mailman".
>> I checked the "mail" directory and "mailman" is the only program found.
>
> I can't speak for Redhat, but this is standard formatting f
At 1:32 AM -0600 2004-09-17, Franco, Ruben wrote:
All the examples I have seen have "mail/wrapper" instead of "mail/mailman".
I checked the "mail" directory and "mailman" is the only program found.
I can't speak for Redhat, but this is standard formatting for
normal Mailman aliases.
--
Brad Kn
At 1:45 AM -0600 2004-09-17, Franco, Ruben wrote:
When I attempt to post to a list, here is the response I receive:
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
"|/usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman post testlist"
(reason: Service unavailable)
(expanded from: <[EMAIL P
When I attempt to post to a list, here is the response I receive:
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
"|/usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman post testlist"
(reason: Service unavailable)
(expanded from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
- Transcript of session follows -