Re: [Mailman-Users] Redhat 3.0 & Mailman 2.1.5 wrapper?

2004-09-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Brad Knowles wrote: >At 1:32 AM -0600 2004-09-17, Franco, Ruben wrote: > >> All the examples I have seen have "mail/wrapper" instead of "mail/mailman". >> I checked the "mail" directory and "mailman" is the only program found. > > I can't speak for Redhat, but this is standard formatting f

Re: [Mailman-Users] Redhat 3.0 & Mailman 2.1.5 wrapper?

2004-09-17 Thread Brad Knowles
At 1:32 AM -0600 2004-09-17, Franco, Ruben wrote: All the examples I have seen have "mail/wrapper" instead of "mail/mailman". I checked the "mail" directory and "mailman" is the only program found. I can't speak for Redhat, but this is standard formatting for normal Mailman aliases. -- Brad Kn

RE: [Mailman-Users] Redhat 3.0 & Mailman 2.1.5 wrapper?

2004-09-17 Thread Brad Knowles
At 1:45 AM -0600 2004-09-17, Franco, Ruben wrote: When I attempt to post to a list, here is the response I receive: - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - "|/usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman post testlist" (reason: Service unavailable) (expanded from: <[EMAIL P

RE: [Mailman-Users] Redhat 3.0 & Mailman 2.1.5 wrapper?

2004-09-17 Thread Franco, Ruben
When I attempt to post to a list, here is the response I receive: - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - "|/usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman post testlist" (reason: Service unavailable) (expanded from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) - Transcript of session follows -