At 11:53 PM +0100 2004/01/05, Dr. M.C. Koops wrote:
I have no experience with smtp, but lots of people tell me that it is
really hard to configure sendmail.
Not really. Using the m4 package, it's pretty easy to build a
sendmail.mc file that can be compiled into a suitable sendmail.cf.
Many s
Title: RE: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman
Yah, I have done that. Decent performance gain. However I still have to use DNS for sendmail itself (don't want an open relay), and I can't run Bind on the box locally so I guess I just have to live with it.
>
Title: RE: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman
Thanks for the answer. By default in Slackware, the sendmail queue was running every 15 minutes, so I set it to 2 minutes. That seems to have sped it up quite a bit. Now if I could just solve the DNS problem without running Bind
On May 3, 2002 12:18 pm, Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC DIN-PACS wrote:
> As of today, I am no longer getting failures in the smtp-error logs,
> however it seems that incoming messages are parsed to mailman, then
> queued for 10 to 40 minutes where they just wait. No errors, no
> timeouts, they just wai
Title: Sendmail Performance with mailman
As of
today, I am no longer getting failures in the smtp-error logs, however it seems
that incoming messages are parsed to mailman, then queued for 10 to 40
minutes where they just wait. No errors, no timeouts, they just
wait. Here is a sample from
