On 7 Dec 2012, at 17:49, David Vereschagin wrote:
> Do tags have to be mapped to IMAP keywords? Mapping them to existing
> IMAP keywords causes every message using that keyword to be given the
> tag. For me this is not a desired result.
This shows that I need to be more clear in my description
MAP keywords of the message
which is a superset of the tags -- and sorry about the
Tags/Keywords/Flags name confusion).
Have a nice weekend.
--
Benny
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freron.com/pipermail/mailmate/attachments
On 6 Dec 2012, at 20:10, Seebs wrote:
>> One possible solution: The ?Show HTML Source? menu item is
>> removed. Instead it is an alternative menu item shown instead of
>> ?Show Raw Message? when holding down ?, that is, the shortcut
>> becomes ???U.
[...]
> I guess there IS a case where "show
One nit to report: if keyboard focus is on the message list, and I use
the 't' key to edit tags, when I finish editing tags, focus doesn't go
back to the message list. (In fact, it doesn't seem to be in the message
display either.)
On 7 Dec 2012, at 15:00, Robert Ricci wrote:
> So far, I love
So far, I love the feature! I'd like to second this request:
On 7 Dec 2012, at 10:40, David Vereschagin wrote:
> Okay, that works. And the smart mailbox now works as expected. Now, if
> I could assign a colour to a tag and have that colour show up in the
> messages list, preferably as a backgro
On 7 Dec 2012, at 12:27, Benny Kj?r Nielsen wrote:
> Just enter a new tag name and let MailMate create a suitable IMAP
> keyword (never use one that is prefixed with $ or \). So, you should
> create the tag Billable with the IMAP keyword Billable.
Okay, that works. And the smart mailbox now wor
Hi, Benny:
> * Preferences include a new pane where tags can be configured. Each
> tag is mapped to an IMAP keyword (IMAP keywords are automatically
> completed using existing IMAP keywords in the database). Note that the
> IMAP server may limit the use of tags. Theoretically tagging should
>
