[MlMt] migrating to new computer

MailMate Folk, I'm trying to migrate MailMate to a new computer. I've copied all the contents of the MailMate folder in Application Support, as well as the freron file in the Preferences folder of ~/Library. Lots of things transfer (like mailboxes), but certain things do not. For example, my

[MlMt] Replying to multiple messages

One thing I miss from my Eudora days is the ability to select a bunch of messages, hit "Reply" (or "Reply All"), and have a new individual reply window opened for each message. So if I did this with ten messages, ten reply windows would be opened. Is there any way to get that reply behavior i

Re: [MlMt] Markdown inside of words

On 3 Apr 2014, at 11:16, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: To me the question should be: Is it worth adding the option of alternative Markdown converters at the price of people using inline HTML and other unreadable plain text? I'm not so sure ;-) Hopefully that’s not how people would use it. That’s

Re: [MlMt] Markdown inside of words

On 3 Apr 2014, at 16:16, Rob McBroom wrote: On 3 Apr 2014, at 5:03, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: I think this would be a good idea. I see many emails where inline-emphasis is used unintentionally and I see very few where it is used intentionally. If anyone feels strongly against such a change t

Re: [MlMt] Markdown inside of words

On Apr 3, 2014, at 9:16 AM, Ingo Lantschner wrote: > So I would still prefer to leave in-word underscores unprocessed. You mean like Github-flavored Markdown? -- Brad Knowles LinkedIn Profile: ___ mailmate mailing list ma

Re: [MlMt] Markdown inside of words

On 3 Apr 2014, at 16:04, Bjørn Bulthuis wrote: If you use backticks around these strings, the underscore is automatically escaped That's true, and sometimes the preferred way as words containing underscores are often code or file-names. But it's getting very cumbersome if you are citing some

Re: [MlMt] Markdown inside of words

On 3 Apr 2014, at 5:03, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: I think this would be a good idea. I see many emails where inline-emphasis is used unintentionally and I see very few where it is used intentionally. If anyone feels strongly against such a change then speak up now. I personally wouldn’t miss

Re: [MlMt] Markdown inside of words

On 3 Apr 2014, at 2:03, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: I think this would be a good idea. I see many emails where inline-emphasis is used unintentionally and I see very few where it is used intentionally. If anyone feels strongly against such a change then speak up now. If you use backticks aroun

Re: [MlMt] Markdown inside of words

On 3 Apr 2014, at 8:17, Ingo Lantschner wrote: I often have e-mails containing e.g. file-names with underscores inside of the name. Example: check_netapp_pro.pl id_rsa_rocks.pub This renders to **check_netapp_pro.pl** and **id_rsa_rocks.pub** if not explicitly marked as code