On 19 Sep 2014, at 6:14, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
I wrote a post with instructions and screen shots showing how I
accomplished this process.
http://jeremy.cowgar.com/2014/09/18/mailmate-waiting-on-reply/
I would be very interested in any improvements, ideas or comments on
the process. I'll be ha
Sorry Benny, it must have been just a fluke that an annoying Facebook
message got through to my Inbox. Everything appears to be working and
the reason I didn't see the rules is because I was looking in the wrong
place.
On 18 Sep 2014, at 7:48, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
On 18 Sep 2014, at 1
On 18 Sep 2014, at 21:48, Kai Großjohann wrote:
On 18 Sep 2014, at 17:54, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
On 18 Sep 2014, at 14:42, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
My company wants corporate email replied to in Outlook fashion :-(.
That is simply depressing. I cannot imagine the reasoning behind such
a st
I have a bunch of key bindings for mass selection and deletion of mail
messages. The deletion ones can be rather dangerous, so sometimes I just
use the selection ones and then hit delete (or file, or whatever is
appropriate).
(I also have an action that sends me a Growl notification of the
su
And of course I no sooner send that out than I find a bug. The subject
selection rules ought to use subject.body to ignore Re and Fwd
```
"s" = ( "selectWithFilter:", "subject.body = '${subject.body}'",
"moveToMailbox:", "trash" );
"s" = ( "selectWithFilter:", "subject.body = '${subject
On 19 Sep 2014, at 11:21, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
On 18 Sep 2014, at 21:48, Kai Großjohann wrote:
Actually, I find that the Outlook threading is better than I had
feared. It actually works pretty well for a "linear" thread like
this one (the one I'm responding to):
I think I should add h
> On Sep 19, 2014, at 4:20 PM, Kai Großjohann wrote:
>
> And don't we all love those responses that say "Please see my replies below
> in orange."
Don't get me started. OTOH, a few times I've tried to do inline replies, and
the had to go to someone's desk to explain which parts were mine. I
