Re: [MlMt] Sorting by date received...

2015-10-07 Thread Benny Kjær Nielsen
On 6 Oct 2015, at 23:47, Seebs wrote: On 6 Oct 2015, at 16:44, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: Agreed. As far as I can see then this would only happen if a message has neither Date header nor any Received headers. I guess I should just make “Date Received” default to the current date (the first

Re: [MlMt] Sorting by date received...

2015-10-06 Thread Benny Kjær Nielsen
On 6 Oct 2015, at 23:33, Seebs wrote: I would sort of prefer for "there is no date available" to be replaced with either Some Other Date, or treated as newer than any date rather than older than any date. Some mail (thus far, exclusively spam) comes in with no date header, and if I have an

Re: [MlMt] Sorting by date received...

2015-10-06 Thread Seebs
On 6 Oct 2015, at 16:44, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: Agreed. As far as I can see then this would only happen if a message has neither Date header nor any Received headers. I guess I should just make “Date Received” default to the current date (the first time MailMate sees it). D'oh. I meant

Re: [MlMt] Sorting by date received...

2015-10-06 Thread Bill Cole
On 6 Oct 2015, at 17:44, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote: On 6 Oct 2015, at 23:33, Seebs wrote: I would sort of prefer for "there is no date available" to be replaced with either Some Other Date, or treated as newer than any date rather than older than any date. Some mail (thus far, exclusively