On 30 May 2018, at 4:05, Mike Hucka wrote:
May I suggest a simple change? Just make the behavior of the
view-change commands "wrap around", so to speak, so that you cycle
through the views in round-robbin fashion. Then (1) key bindings can
stay the same, yet (2) people like me who are too du
On 29 May 2018, at 22:05, Mike Hucka wrote:
Just make the behavior of the view-change commands "wrap around", so
to speak, so that you cycle through the views in round-robbin fashion.
Agreed. I don’t do it often, but I’m always a little surprised when
it doesn’t work that way.
--
Rob McBroo
Good idea Mike. Seconded.
On 30 May 2018, at 4:05, Mike Hucka wrote:
Currently, there are key bindings for next/previous alternatives
views. I use these to flip between HTML and plain-text views of
messages. It works fine, but for one annoyance: there are two keys,
and I can never remember
Currently, there are key bindings for next/previous alternatives views.
I use these to flip between HTML and plain-text views of messages. It
works fine, but for one annoyance: there are two keys, and I can never
remember which direction to go (is plain-text "next" or "previous" from
what I'm
