[mailop] Microsoft POP3 Troubles

2016-05-04 Thread Chris via mailop
Hi all, Not sure if this is the right list to post this to. I was reviewing my flow records and I can see in the last 24h we have started doing a much larger amount of POP3 traffic to Microsoft than usual. As an example, some of the IP's that are making the POP3 connections are: 40.96.25.11

Re: [mailop] DNS Errors for Microsoft Hostnames

2016-05-04 Thread Steve Atkins
> > On May 4, 2016, at 4:19 PM, Franck Martin via mailop > wrote: > > I like to use this tool to tell me everything... > > I used it on the first domain, told me there are 2 errors: > http://dnsviz.net/d/alleghenycourts-us.mail.protection.outlook.com/dnssec/ That's just the same "these server

Re: [mailop] DNS Errors for Microsoft Hostnames

2016-05-04 Thread Michael Wise
Microsoft officially doesn’t do DNSSEC. (or at least not now anyway) Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ? From: Franck Martin

Re: [mailop] DNS Errors for Microsoft Hostnames

2016-05-04 Thread Franck Martin via mailop
I like to use this tool to tell me everything... I used it on the first domain, told me there are 2 errors: http://dnsviz.net/d/alleghenycourts-us.mail.protection.outlook.com/dnssec/ On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Rob Heilman wrote: > Got a fresh batch of DNS failures in the logs. Below is a

[mailop] Yahoo delivery issues

2016-05-04 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 208.88.52.225, 208.88.52.226, 208.88.52.227 For the last month, ALL the outbound mail is dkim signed. We have signed up for Yahoo, AOL and MS feedback loops. Yahoo had a single report two weeks ago where we had a user account with weak credentials.

Re: [mailop] DNS Errors for Microsoft Hostnames

2016-05-04 Thread Rob Heilman
Got a fresh batch of DNS failures in the logs. Below is a sampling. From the BIND source code resolver.c: } else if (result != ISC_R_SUCCESS) { /* * Something bad happened. */ fctx_

Re: [mailop] Truncate DNSBL

2016-05-04 Thread Vick Khera
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 2:05 AM, Renaud Allard via mailop wrote: > I never heard of truncate DNSBL before but it's easy to get over 95% > spam if they have only a few "sniffers", just send one unique message > looking spammy to their "sniffers", and you are good to go with 100% spam. > They also

Re: [mailop] Truncate DNSBL

2016-05-04 Thread David Hofstee
I don't know if it is reliable. It is not well-known afaik. Met vriendelijke groet, David Hofstee Deliverability Management MailPlus B.V. Netherlands -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] Namens Renaud Allard via mailop Verzonden: woensdag 4 mei 2016 1

Re: [mailop] Truncate DNSBL

2016-05-04 Thread Renaud Allard via mailop
On 05/04/2016 11:38 AM, David Hofstee wrote: > Well, v4bl is not a reliable blacklist. I would ignore any listing there. > > So his IP is only listed, afaik, on the Truncate list (which is why he mailed > to the list in the first place). > Is Truncate BL a reliable blacklist either? smim

Re: [mailop] Truncate DNSBL

2016-05-04 Thread David Hofstee
Well, v4bl is not a reliable blacklist. I would ignore any listing there. So his IP is only listed, afaik, on the Truncate list (which is why he mailed to the list in the first place). Met vriendelijke groet, David Hofstee Deliverability Management MailPlus B.V. Netherlands -Oorspronk