Re: [mailop] Mysterious DKIM failure.

2016-12-11 Thread Dave Crocker
On 12/11/2016 9:41 AM, Luke Martinez wrote: believe if only one canonicalization tag is specified, the other defaults to "simple" So in this case, "relaxed" is the header canonicalization, and the body canonicalization would be "simple" which tolerates no modification. Ahhh. Thanks for catchin

Re: [mailop] Mysterious DKIM failure.

2016-12-11 Thread Steve Atkins
> > On Dec 11, 2016, at 8:53 AM, Dave Crocker wrote: > > On 12/10/2016 8:08 AM, Al Iverson wrote: >> Suggestion...modify the template to remove all the tabs or replace >> them with spaces, and try again. If it passes on both, then you've >> found that something in the delivery path is replacing

Re: [mailop] Mysterious DKIM failure.

2016-12-11 Thread Luke Martinez via mailop
Dave, I believe if only one canonicalization tag is specified, the other defaults to "simple" So in this case, "relaxed" is the header canonicalization, and the body canonicalization would be "simple" which tolerates no modification. Its a good thought though. If this turns out to be a whitespace

Re: [mailop] Mysterious DKIM failure.

2016-12-11 Thread Dave Crocker
On 12/10/2016 8:08 AM, Al Iverson wrote: Suggestion...modify the template to remove all the tabs or replace them with spaces, and try again. If it passes on both, then you've found that something in the delivery path is replacing tabs with spaces, invalidating the DKIM signature. The original