Sadly, I'm still having a problem where my hosting company's mail
servers keep being listed in Spamhaus CSS, despite working for days to
identify the cause. (208.80.4.163 is an example listed now.)
I've written to sbl-remov...@spamhaus.org, but have received no response
after several days.
If any
Hi,
If there's anyone from NiX Spam in this list, could you please contact me
offlist?
Thanks in advance!
regards,
--
*Daniel Baqueiro*
Deliverability EMEA
Groupon International Ltd.
Connaught House |1 Burlington Rd | Dublin 4, Ireland
___
[ Forwarded from the NANOG list. Please note the deadline is today. ---rsk ]
- Forwarded message from Peter Eckersley -
> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 16:05:34 -0700
> From: Peter Eckersley
> To: na...@nanog.org
> Subject: EFF Call for sign-ons: ISPs, networking companies and engineers
>
This thread no longer (if it ever was) seems to be about running of mail
servers.
Discussion on domain name policy is not on-topic for this group and
general anti-spam politics isn't really either.
Simon.
Mailop Co-Moderator
--
Simon Lyall | Very Busy | Web: http://www.simonlyall.com/
> Il 27 marzo 2017 alle 0.22 "Rob McEwen, invaluement.com"
> ha scritto:
>
>
> John Levine said:
> "The problem is that the pro-crime crowd keep demanding that all the rest be
> anonymous or effectively anonymous, too."
>
> Exactly!
>
> Also, like some who are arguing against Neil Sw. on this
