On 2018-03-01 16:26, David Carriger wrote:
Yes, I'm still seeing this. So, an open question:
As an ESP, how am I supposed to tell my users to practice good list
hygiene and remove unengaged recipients from their lists when my data is
being tainted by Google/Microsoft/etc triggering all of my e
> On Mar 2, 2018, at 12:45 PM, John Johnstone
> wrote:
>
> The list washers / validators must be doing a brisk business today. Many use
> Amazon hosting in what seems to be an attempt to evade blocking by IP. Aside
> from the simple attempts I see some that are trying things like:
>
> j...@
The list washers / validators must be doing a brisk business today.
Many use Amazon hosting in what seems to be an attempt to evade blocking
by IP. Aside from the simple attempts I see some that are trying things
like:
j...@domain.tld
john@domain.tld
jon@domain.tld
john-...@domain.tld
One approach is to have the landing page for the unsubscribe include another
confirmation action/button. This way a GET of the page for security inspection
will not trigger the actual removal from the list
> On Mar 1, 2018, at 3:36 PM, "mailop-requ...@mailop.org"
> wrote:
>
> Send mailop ma
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 6:26 PM, David Carriger <
david.carri...@infusionsoft.com> wrote:
> Yes, I'm still seeing this. So, an open question:
>
> As an ESP, how am I supposed to tell my users to practice good list
> hygiene and remove unengaged recipients from their lists when my data is
> being ta
