On 6/6/2018 8:11 PM, Brandon Long wrote:
Isn't the simplest way to handle this is to treat IPv6 at the /64 or
smaller level?
Brandon,
Everything I've stated in that article, and in my comments on this
thread - came with the foreknowledge that many of those who have
discussed implementing IPv
> On Jun 6, 2018, at 5:11 PM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
>
>
>
> Isn't the simplest way to handle this is to treat IPv6 at the /64 or smaller
> level? More likely, because most people use IPv4, the RBL's just don't have
> the data sources they need to populate the data, not because of s
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 4:48 PM Rob McEwen wrote:
> On 6/6/2018 6:32 PM, Steve Atkins wrote:
>
> To answer the question in the title: "Probably, yes. Only if your spam
> filtering is bad." As Rob mentions in his article in the case he's discussing
> the spam would have been blocked if they'd had
On 6/6/2018 6:32 PM, Steve Atkins wrote:
To answer the question in the title: "Probably, yes. Only if your spam filtering is
bad." As Rob mentions in his article in the case he's discussing the spam would have
been blocked if they'd had better spam filtering in place.
Steve,
(1) in that part
> On Jun 6, 2018, at 1:41 PM, SM wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
> At 01:08 PM 06-06-2018, Rob McEwen wrote:
>> Here is an article I posted on Linkedin about spam filtering IPv6-sent email.
>>
>> "Should mail servers publish IPv6 MX records? Could this harm your spam
>> filtering?"
>
> In other words, DNS
Hi Rob,
At 01:08 PM 06-06-2018, Rob McEwen wrote:
Here is an article I posted on Linkedin about spam filtering IPv6-sent email.
"Should mail servers publish IPv6 MX records? Could this harm your
spam filtering?"
In other words, DNSBLs have a scalability problem.
Regards,
-sm
Here is an article I posted on Linkedin about spam filtering IPv6-sent
email.
"Should mail servers publish IPv6 MX records? Could this harm your spam
filtering?"
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-mail-servers-publish-ipv6-mx-records-rob-mcewen/
--
Rob McEwen
https://www.invaluement.com
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:09 PM Steve Atkins wrote:
> > Hence, only half of Domain based blacklists that I know about support
> > the TEST address. That's why I prefer to test something less artificial
> > in this particular case.
>
> Checking other things is a reasonable defensive maneuver for yo
> On Jun 6, 2018, at 9:13 AM, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote:
>
> On 06/06/2018 16:55, Steve Atkins wrote:
>>
>>
>> IPv4 blacklists will always list 127.0.0.2 and never 127.0.0.1.
>> IPv6 blacklists will always list :::7F00:2 and never :::7F00:1.
>> Domain based blacklists will always list "TE
On 06/06/2018 09:03, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 at 09:52, Gianluca wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> we experience some problems with sectoor.de blacklist, our ips are
>> blacklisted into this list but the main web page of the blacklist
>> http://www.sectoor.de/tor.php is simply a blank page
We saw the same thing yesterday, but were quickly delisted without action on
our end.
Matt Jenkins
From: mailop On Behalf Of Gianluca
Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 9:49 AM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: [mailop] sectoor TOR blacklist
Hi all,
we experience some problems with sectoor.de blackl
On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 at 09:52, Gianluca wrote:
> Hi all,
> we experience some problems with sectoor.de blacklist, our ips are
> blacklisted into this list but the main web page of the blacklist
> http://www.sectoor.de/tor.php is simply a blank page without informations.
> Anyone wih the same probl
Laura Atkins posted about this recently -
https://wordtothewise.com/2018/06/another-day-another-dead-blacklist/
"It looks like the blacklist domain expired and is now parked. So they're
listing the world and nothing to worry about"
So yep, seems safe to ignore. :)
Tamara Bond
Email Delivery En
Hi all,
we experience some problems with *sectoor**.de* blacklist, our ips are
blacklisted into this list but the main web page of the blacklist
http://www.sectoor.de/tor.php is simply a blank page without informations.
Anyone wih the same problem? Can we consider it a False Positive?
Gian
SNDS authorization emails are working again.
Thanks Michael!
Regards,
[image: Sender] Edgaras Vaitkevičius, founder / CEO
edga...@sender.net
+370 627 60923
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 18:16:58 +
> From: Michael Wise
> To: "mailop@mailop.org"
> Subject: Re: [mailop] SNDS report issues?
> Me
15 matches
Mail list logo
