No comments from this side, obviously... except that everything old is new
again:
https://www.google.com/search?q=trump+campaign+email+gmail+spam
Also, doesn't CAN-SPAM only apply to senders?
Brandon
(not speaking on behalf of Google)
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 11:19 AM Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via
On 7/26/19 13:38, Brett Schenker via mailop wrote:
They've always been a bit cagey when I asked but from what I've been
told it's opted-in individuals and data comes directly from email
providers they have agreements with. While it's not perfect, it does
seem to do a decent job of telling trend
They've always been a bit cagey when I asked but from what I've been told
it's opted-in individuals and data comes directly from email providers they
have agreements with. While it's not perfect, it does seem to do a decent
job of telling trends. In this case, I'd read it as "they don't have a
prob
On 26-07-2019 13:21, Brett Schenker via mailop wrote:
> It's been 98.4% inbox placement according to ReturnPath PartnerApp since
> March... so... yeah...
How does ReturnPath obtain those numbers? At a quick glance I didn't
find a technical explanation on their website.
Thank you.
Cheers,
Dan
__
On 7/26/19 11:34, Michael Wise via mailop wrote:
And since, as I gather, her political speech emails are not coming from
a .GOV address, this could get complicated.
I think that's going to be a non-issue. Political speech of anyone
running for but not in office won't come from a .gov address.
It's been 98.4% inbox placement according to ReturnPath PartnerApp since
March... so... yeah...
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 3:12 PM Mike Hammett via mailop
wrote:
> IANAL, but I would also assume that it would have to be a remarkably
> higher rate of SPAM classification to show as intentful. 5% more
IANAL, but I would also assume that it would have to be a remarkably higher
rate of SPAM classification to show as intentful. 5% more than anyone else
doesn't really mean anything.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- O
I first have to say Gabbard is a client so what I can say is limited but...
Using pretty available info from ReturnPath (that anyone that pays can
get), I have no idea where they're getting the idea they're having
deliverability issues.
Knowing the bigger space,and the stats to go with it, to say
Thanks Ann for sharing,
And you are right, this "could" be opening a scary can of worms for
'anyone' who is or has control or influence on delivering messages of
any type, (eg Twitter, Spam Filtering companies, etc).
During the last election this was a concern, Democrats complaining
Republic
And since, as I gather, her political speech emails are not coming from a .GOV
address, this could get complicated.
I do wonder whom else will be made a party to such a lawsuit in short order.
Aloha,
Michael.
--
Michael J Wise
Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis
"Your Spam Specimen Has Been P
While at first blush the big news about this lawsuit is that Google is being
sued for suppressing presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard's campaign's ads,
there is also a piece of the lawsuit where they are suing Google because (they
claim) a disproportionate number of her campaign's email was bei
Hi Michael,
in past experiences I saw a lot of time similar messages even on new IP
address just installed.
I don't know exactly the meaning of S3150 but the message generally
means that the IP has been temporary blocked (you can check it on SNDS
on IP status section).
It should happens when th
12 matches
Mail list logo
