On Tue, 18 Feb 2020, Matt Palmer via mailop wrote:
great, but it's an unfortunate side-effect of providing anonymity.
Frankly, if you were feeling up to the job of scripting it,
pre-emptively putting all Tor exit nodes which allow connections to port
25 in your RBL would not be a bad idea (exi
* Graeme Fowler via mailop :
> On 12 Feb 2020, at 16:39, I wrote:
> > Step 2 is about to happen: I’m about to change the registered nameservers
> > for the domain.
>
> When I wrote "about to happen" I did not factor in some really strange
> behaviour from OpenSRS, which we've now managed to get
On 18/02/2020 09:37, Paul Smith via mailop wrote:
> From past experience of technical mailing lists changing to forums,
> I'd expect participation in a forum to drop dramatically. Mailing list
> messages get pushed to members, forums require you to go and look.
> Even if new posted messages are ema
Would someone from AT&T abuse RBL contact me off list, please? Trying to
resolve an issue. AT&T is blocking. I've sent requests, just automated
responses and still blocked.
Thanks,
Curtis
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nos
On 17 Feb 2020, at 19:03, Scott Mutter via mailop wrote:
> Regarding the suggestion for "content/questions/answers/links to put on the
> website" - have you ever considered making this mailing list into a forum?
If we as a community can’t make use of a mailing list to sort out
interoperability
I definitely agree with this, I go through my email, but hardly ever
log on to forums, its just too much of a pita. Forms are useful, but
mailing lists are better unless you get replies to replies ... too to
many levels.
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 05:00:24 -0500,
Bjoern Franke via mailop wrote:
>
> >
>
> Google Groups ;)
>
Until Google refuses again to accept your mail ;)
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Dnia 18.02.2020 o godz. 09:37:07 Paul Smith via mailop pisze:
>
> If you can find a system which allows forum replies to be sent by
> email (basically a forum and mailing list in parallel), then that
> works OK, but they're not that common AFAIAA.
Google Groups ;)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
On 18/02/2020 09:47, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote:
I thought DKIM was supposed to flag such messages;
do these phishing emails satisfy DKIM ?
DKIM checks that the message matches the DKIM signature - ie that it
hasn't been modified since sending. That's it.
So, for instance, your me
>
> From past experience of technical mailing lists changing to forums, I'd
> expect participation in a forum to drop dramatically. Mailing list
> messages get pushed to members, forums require you to go and look. Even
> if new posted messages are emailed to members, then it still requires
>
I thought DKIM was supposed to flag such messages;
do these phishing emails satisfy DKIM ?
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020, Benoit Panizzon via mailop wrote:
Hi List
Lately, our customers are getting an increased amount of phishing
emails, or emails containing malware with legit looking From: headers
fro
On 17/02/2020 19:03, Scott Mutter via mailop wrote:
Regarding the suggestion for "content/questions/answers/links to put on the
website" - have you ever considered making this mailing list into a forum?
I just like discussion forums a lot better than I do discussion mailing lists.
In my opini
On 18/02/2020 09:03, Benoit Panizzon via mailop wrote:
SPF would block the From email addresses if also used as envelope
sender. But the, from the customers perspective 'hidden' envelope
sender is different and does match SPF.
Has anyone come up with a clever recipe for this issue?
This is on
Hi List
Lately, our customers are getting an increased amount of phishing
emails, or emails containing malware with legit looking From: headers
from either banks, or even from our own customer support.
SPF would block the From email addresses if also used as envelope
sender. But the, from the cus
14 matches
Mail list logo
