[mailop] Anyone from Earthlink.net here?

2021-07-23 Thread Robert Schoneman via mailop
If there's anyone here from Earthlink.net who can assist with an issue I'd appreciate it. We're having trouble delivering transactional email to Earthlink.net customers. It's not going to spam, and we're not getting bounce backs. Earthlink support has told one customer we "need to enable SPF" an

Re: [mailop] m-365 still works like a spammer !

2021-07-23 Thread Bastian Blank via mailop
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 09:44:38PM +0200, Thomas Walter via mailop wrote: > Regarding RFC974 >If the list of MX RRs is not empty, the mailer SHOULD try to deliver >the message to the MXs in order (lowest preference value tried >first). The mailer IS REQUIRED to attempt delivery to the

Re: [mailop] SMTP AUTH harassment

2021-07-23 Thread yuv via mailop
On Sun, 2021-07-18 at 13:56 -0400, Bill Cole via mailop wrote: > On 2021-07-18 at 06:43:51 UTC-0400 (Sun, 18 Jul 2021 12:43:51 +0200) > Slavko via mailop > is rumored to have said: > > [...] > > > The only usable way seems to be GoiIP blocking countries, but i > > afraid > > that it is wrong way

Re: [mailop] m-365 still works like a spammer !

2021-07-23 Thread yuv via mailop
On Fri, 2021-07-23 at 21:44 +0200, Thomas Walter via mailop wrote: > Regarding RFC974 > If the list of MX RRs is not empty, the mailer SHOULD try to > deliver > the message to the MXs in order (lowest preference value tried > first). The mailer IS REQUIRED to attempt delivery to the l

Re: [mailop] m-365 still works like a spammer !

2021-07-23 Thread Thomas Walter via mailop
Hi, On 23.07.21 19:44, Xavier Beaudouin via mailop wrote: Well had another domain with 10 priority, same bloody behavior... Still don't understand why Microsoft does not implements RFC974 as it should... (well Microsoft and the mail has been a lng way to break all RFCs but... in this ca

Re: [mailop] m-365 still works like a spammer !

2021-07-23 Thread Xavier Beaudouin via mailop
Hello, > On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, Xavier Beaudouin via mailop wrote: > >> domain.tld. IN MX 0 mx1.domain.tld. > >> Why on hell they persist and sign to send mail ONLY on mx2 ? (all MX are >> unfortunatly on same AS, so no this is not routing issues). > > I wonder if this is a particular handli

Re: [mailop] m-365 still works like a spammer !

2021-07-23 Thread Andre van Eyssen via mailop
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, Xavier Beaudouin via mailop wrote: domain.tld. IN MX 0 mx1.domain.tld. Why on hell they persist and sign to send mail ONLY on mx2 ? (all MX are unfortunatly on same AS, so no this is not routing issues). I wonder if this is a particular handling of a priority of zer

[mailop] m-365 still works like a spammer !

2021-07-23 Thread Xavier Beaudouin via mailop
Hello, Another good work from Microsoft that still send mail to the MX with the HIGH weight, instead of lower weight... Did they use the same techniques as spammer to send their mail... Really they are brain damaged... Exemple : domain.tld. IN MX 0 mx1.domain.tld. domain.tld. IN MX 1000 mx2.do

[mailop] Anyone from Cyren on list?

2021-07-23 Thread Josh Nason via mailop
Hi all -- If anyone from Cyren happen to be on the list or if anyone has a contact, could you email me directly? Much appreciated. Josh from Oracle Dyn ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop