It appears that Chris via mailop said:
>On 2022-05-13 12:57, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
>
>> I suspect that their $BLOCKING method has progressed to false positives
>> as a way to get email administrator's attention.
>
>It's progressed to false positives because some people run mail servers
On 2022-05-13 12:57, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
I suspect that their $BLOCKING method has progressed to false positives
as a way to get email administrator's attention.
It's progressed to false positives because some people run mail servers
who aren't parsing DNSBL return codes right. The
The policy was implemented in March 2021 over a year ago.
The 127.255.255.254 is the return code, not the IP queried. From
https://www.spamhaus.org/news/article/807/using-our-public-mirrors-check-your-return-codes-now.
A reminder
As of March 2021, we will begin the implementation of the f
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 10:57:21AM -0600, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
> Spamhaus has stated that they were going to disable access via high -- my
> words -- open public recursive resolvers since the very first message they
> published about this 3-6 months ago.
I'm pretty sure I've read that er
We're seeing these for localhost netblock, which seems kinda odd...
Error: open resolver; https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/127.255.255.254
On 2022-05-13 12:32 PM, Jarland Donnell via mailop wrote:
> I'm not sure if the rest of you are seeing the same, but I've seen a
> lot of errors like thi
Dňa 13. mája 2022 17:01:14 UTC používateľ Grant Taylor via mailop
napísal:
> From memory, their upper bound for the free DQS was something on the
>order of 10,000 queries per day. I suspect there's even a little fudge
>room therein.
While i understand, that one have to save own resources, an
Could be luck of the draw but I hadn't actively seen any prior to 2
weeks ago. A reasonably large web host in Canada was the first I saw,
and since then it's just been a trickle of little hosts or individually
managed servers.
On 2022-05-13 11:51, Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
This isn't reall
On 5/13/22 10:51 AM, Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
It's also not hard to get a free
DQS key from Spamhaus for low volume usage:
https://www.spamhaus.com/free-trial/sign-up-for-a-free-data-query-service-account/
I recommend it, as they guide you through extra steps to get the most
out of the Spa
On 5/13/22 10:32 AM, Jarland Donnell via mailop wrote:
554 Service unavailable; Client host [mail-108-mta215.mxroute.com]
blocked by sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org; Error: open resolver;
https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/74.63.16.232
It seems that Spamhaus is cracking down on a certain type of activi
This isn't really new but I guess it's good to keep banging the drum.
I blogged about it back in January -
https://www.spamresource.com/2022/01/querying-spamhaus-via-cloudflare-dns.html
It's clear to me that Spamhaus has long taken a dim view of querying
via public resolvers; but their strategy to
I'm not sure if the rest of you are seeing the same, but I've seen a lot
of errors like this lately:
554 Service unavailable; Client host [mail-108-mta215.mxroute.com]
blocked by sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org; Error: open resolver;
https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/74.63.16.232
It seems that Spamh
Greetings All, Just an informational message that we are going to begin
migrating mail accounts from various platforms to a new one. The new IP's for
this platform are as follows. Unfortunately, we did not get the time we wanted
to warmup the IP's and for this we apologize and ask for
12 matches
Mail list logo
