I guess companies are using hand-rolled DMARC report generators that
don't pay attention to standards... just on my personal domains, I see
multiple kinds of failures. Today I've had several with an invalid
Message-Id header (no brackets, I see this from multiple sites so I
guess some common repor
> On 2024-01-19 at 15:42:49 UTC-0500 (Fri, 19 Jan 2024 12:42:49 -0800)
> Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop
>
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > Spamhaus makes the DROP data available (which I believe is also
> > included in their SBL), which is useful for using firewalls to just
> > bl
Dnia 19.01.2024 o godz. 12:42:49 Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop
pisze:
> UCE Protect also has level 3 listings for the worst offenders,
> although I don't recall the list being downloadable for firewall use:
>
> UCEPROTECT Blacklist Policy LEVEL 3
> h
On 2024-01-14 15:28, Alexander Huynh via mailop wrote:
From a spam point of view, signing up for a domain is a barrier of
entry which some may consider too much trouble.
This may play into why there's a larger distribution of unwanted mail
on the freely-provided `*.onmicrosoft.com` subdomains
On 2024-01-19 at 15:42:49 UTC-0500 (Fri, 19 Jan 2024 12:42:49 -0800)
Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop
is rumored to have said:
Spamhaus makes the DROP data available (which I believe is also
included in their SBL), which is useful for using firewalls to just
block or ignore c
