On Sat, 2024-06-29 at 10:31 +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via mailop wrote:
>
> Reading your first post brought to mind the recent report of potential
> issues at Microsoft's outbound servers with "too many" TLSA records
> (more than ~12). I was looking at your TLSA RRset (14 TLSA records):
I've been
smtp-dane not passed?
6/28/2024 8:04:14 PM - Server at PH8PR20MB5100.namprd20.prod.outlook.com
returned '550 5.7.324 dnssec-invalid: Destination domain returned
invalid DNSSEC records(450 4.7.324 dnssec-invalid: Destination domain
returned invalid DNSSEC records)'
--
Jeff Pang
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 07:50:09PM -0400, Jim P. via mailop wrote:
> I just received back a bounce that was delivered to my @live.com
> address, the one that sent the test message a few days ago. Here is
> what it contains:
Reading your first post brought to mind the recent report of potential
I just received back a bounce that was delivered to my @live.com
address, the one that sent the test message a few days ago. Here is
what it contains:
---
Undeliverable: Test 1
postmas...@outlook.com
You
Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
Jim
> Microsoft is trying (over and
> over) to send me emails, and they get past connect/disconnect. This has
> been going on for a few days now, at a rate of once every 5 seconds.
I also experience this. In the past, I've filed a support request with
Microsoft asking for an explanation, but
Hello!
I have an odd deliverability problem. Microsoft is trying (over and
over) to send me emails, and they get past connect/disconnect. This has
been going on for a few days now, at a rate of once every 5 seconds.
I've tested verified that everything about my mail flow is working fine
and
On 6/28/24 11:00 AM, Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
If you want to trust me with the person's email address, I'll pass it to
a bunch of ESP deliverability/compliance people and ask them to unsub it
en masse, if they can. Some will and it might help. We've done it before
for others.
Thank you
If you want to trust me with the person's email address, I'll pass it to a
bunch of ESP deliverability/compliance people and ask them to unsub it en
masse, if they can. Some will and it might help. We've done it before for
others.
Cheers,
Al
--
Al Iverson // 312-725-0130 // Chicago
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 9:24 AM James Hoddinott via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> Your main issue is that Transip sure do like to let spammers make use of
> many IPs within the /24 that you're in, we'll just need to flag yours as
> separate to prevent this from reoccurring.
>
>
Wouldn't
Hello,
That is very intersting, and would explain what is happening. Thanks for
the clarification.
Thank you
Ted
easyDNS Technologies
On 2024-06-28 06:06, Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote:
On Thu 27/Jun/2024 21:41:39 +0200 Adam D. Barratt via mailop wrote:
On Thu, 2024-06-27 at 14:50
> Your main issue is that Transip sure do like to let spammers make use of
> many IPs within the /24 that you're in, we'll just need to flag yours as
> separate to prevent this from reoccurring.
While I understand some of the logic behind blocking entire /24s, this kind of
block makes it very
Your main issue is that Transip sure do like to let spammers make use of
many IPs within the /24 that you're in, we'll just need to flag yours as
separate to prevent this from reoccurring.
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 at 10:19, Kasper Peeters via mailop
wrote:
> Is there anyone from Cloudmark on the
Replied offlist
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 28, 2024, at 4:22 AM, Kasper Peeters via mailop
> wrote:
>
> Is there anyone from Cloudmark on the list who can help getting
> 37.97.176.137 off the blocklist? This server does not send mass/unsollicited
> email, has correct SPF/DKIM/DMARC, is
Adding to Taavi's List-Unsub condition - I've had similar success with
List-unsubscribe identification for transactional-volume attacks, and
also with a few additional indicators for transactional mail that are
below. These are Proofpoint-specific conditions, but can be (mostly)
translated to
On Thu 27/Jun/2024 21:41:39 +0200 Adam D. Barratt via mailop wrote:
On Thu, 2024-06-27 at 14:50 -0400, Ted Smith via mailop wrote:
That conbined with the hard fail indicated could account for the
rejection of the message, except that I don't understand why the SPF
check would be done for the
On Fri 28/Jun/2024 11:34:13 +0200 Richard Clayton via mailop wrote:
Finally, you may be seeing X emails per time period from Y people.
Messages sent from Y machines are a different matter, methinks. Except for
expressly requested monitoring services, automatically generated messages
should
In message , Ferris,
Rhys (SCC) via mailop writes
>In the last 24 hours we have received 693,937 emails
>from select freemail domains with top senders having sent between 500 and 800
>emails in a single day. This has been ongoing and in the last 30 days we have
>received 23,196,000+ emails
Is there anyone from Cloudmark on the list who can help getting 37.97.176.137
off the blocklist? This server does not send mass/unsollicited email, has
correct SPF/DKIM/DMARC, is not on any other blocklist (as far s I can see) and
there is no evidence of abuse in the logs. I have filled out the
The best method we've found was to reject all letters with
List-Unsubscribe header (or similar) sent to that victim.
This obviously has side-effects, but they're tolerable compared to the
flood of letters.
I should note that these letters are usually sent in order to cover up
something like
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 08:40:20AM +0200, Benny Pedersen via mailop wrote:
> > Does anyone here have a UTF-8 email address you'd let me send some
> > test messages to?
>
> so you know any dns servers that support utf-8 ?
[ Benny, here and on postfix-users, I'd like to encourage you to refrain
Hi,
for a bit of background:
RFC 7208, which defines SPF, defines two kinds of identity, namely the "MAIL
FROM identity" and the "HELO identity", in sections 2.3 and 2.4 respectively.
The HELO identity is the HELO hostname, assuming that is is a valid domain name.
The MAIL FROM identity is the
Christine Borgia via mailop skrev den 2024-06-27 21:55:
Does anyone here have a UTF-8 email address you'd let me send some
test messages to?
so you know any dns servers that support utf-8 ?
dns servers that set the glue record must support utf-8, not just idn,
what will happend if both idn
22 matches
Mail list logo
