On Thu, 2024-06-27 at 14:50 -0400, Ted Smith via mailop wrote:
> That conbined with the hard fail indicated could account for the
> rejection of the message, except that I don't understand why the SPF
> check would be done for the helo hostname of the forwarding server,
> and why that result would
On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 12:11 +, Florian Vierke via mailop wrote:
> I have understood it that way:
>
> If you implement DMARC as a recipient, you must check for DKIM and
> for SPF, exactly because one of them is sufficient to pass. If you do
> only check SPF as a receiver and the sender is authe
On Tue, 2020-08-11 at 09:22 -0700, Len Shneyder via mailop wrote:
> Thanks for pointing this out and I'm sorry you're still seeing what
> sounds like a high volume of phish. I've asked our fraud ops team to
> investigate this. In the future if you could send suspicious emails
> to ab...@sendgrid.co
On Fri, 2020-07-10 at 09:22 -0700, Job Cacka via mailop wrote:
> slowmailtest...@ccbox.com
> slowmailtest...@ccbox.com
>
> slowmailtest...@p-r-c.com
> slowmailtest...@p-r-c.com
From a quick test, at least half of connections get immediately
rejected, which probably isn't helping:
adam@kotick:$
On Sun, 2020-05-17 at 12:30 +0200, ml+mailop--- via mailop wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2020, Alessio Cecchi via mailop wrote:
>
> > the domain name is stefanoboschi.it and after the transfer from one
>
> dig stefanoboschi.it. mx
> stefanoboschi.it. 3500IN MX 10 mx01.cbsolt.net.
> s
