Re: [mailop] PTR check mechanism / gmail

Den 04-03-2024 kl. 01:17 skrev Gareth Evans via mailop: Given: Received: from atlas.bondproducts.com (unknown [23.24.6.165]) by mx6.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ... [...] Received: from users.shellworld.net (users.shellworld.net [50.116.47.71]) by atlas.bondproduct

Re: [mailop] iCloud outage?

Den 17-01-2024 kl. 08:47 skrev Jarland Donnell via mailop: 450 Error connecting to 17.57.156.30. Unexpected socket close I believe I see the same kind of unexpected socket close, ... given a quick telnet: $ telnet 17.57.156.30 25 Trying 17.57.156.30... Connected to 17.57.156.30. Escape char

Re: [mailop] salesforce phishing emails

Den 30-11-2023 kl. 09:36 skrev Giovanni Bechis via mailop: I maintain an ESP rbl Thank you for maintaining and providing that! I looked around and didn't find much information about the operation of the RBL though. So that raises a few questions from my end, such as: - Is there any sort of

Re: [mailop] New Google DNS Servers? 192.178.65.0/28 NO PTR records.. anyone? Brandon?

d to update our internal documentation, but still no excuse for Google not to have reverse DNS in place on these IPs. Thanks Arne. On 2023-11-13 21:59, Arne Jensen via mailop wrote: Den 13-11-2023 kl. 23:35 skrev Michael Peddemors via mailop: Of course, Google never SWIP's their segments very

Re: [mailop] New Google DNS Servers? 192.178.65.0/28 NO PTR records.. anyone? Brandon?

Den 13-11-2023 kl. 23:35 skrev Michael Peddemors via mailop: Of course, Google never SWIP's their segments very well, but with no PTR records, not much to go on.. Not much to go on, hmm ... ... Have you tried the Google Public DNS documentation? :) large DNS Queries coming from this range, an

Re: [mailop] Out-of-office from Gmail going toward the MAIL FROM address....???

Den 02-07-2021 kl. 17:00 skrev Marco Pizzoli via mailop: > Dear, > do you consider it normal to see out-of-office messages being sent > toward the MAIL FROM, instead of the From:  address?? More like the industry standard? RFC3834 - Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail ->

Re: [mailop] MTA-STS issues

Den 15-05-2021 kl. 03:53 skrev Eric Germann via mailop: > I’ve enabled MTA-STS for the domain semperen.com . Adding DANE and/or MTA-STS configurations is one thing, another would be if your mail server actually allow (or even signals that it allows the upgrade to) encrypted c

Re: [mailop] Microsoft Consumer Email Deliverability Issue

Den 01-05-2021 kl. 22:44 skrev Pierre Ozoux via mailop: > We are a small provider based in France ( https://indiehosters.net ) > and we have all in place (DMARC, DKIM, PTR, SNDS, JMRP, and a really > strict SPF) A really strict SPF sounds nice, ... but where exactly? You're actually using the we

Re: [mailop] Spam from Google Work Space sender domain via Google IP(s)

Den 28-04-2021 kl. 06:27 skrev vsai--- via mailop: > I've been receiving spam and phishing scams from Google IP(s). > > All these messages have the sender domains associated either with > Godaddy or with Google work space. > > Some of the sample sender domains are listed below: > > ***

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus Public Mirror Error Return Code Update

Den 15-02-2021 kl. 18:53 skrev Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop: > Dnia 15.02.2021 o godz. 15:43:56 Matthew Stith via mailop pisze: >> Wanted to get this out to you all for awareness for anyone who is using >> the Spamhaus public mirrors to query our DNSBLs. Beginning in March >> Spamhaus will start enfor

Re: [mailop] Spamcop

Den 31-01-2021 kl. 17:52 skrev Al Iverson: > It looks to me as though the domain has been renewed. I believe the > problem should now be resolved (or should be shortly if you're caching > bad DNS). Exactly my point with the notification about the update, to signal that the domain had been renewed

Re: [mailop] Spamcop

Den 31-01-2021 kl. 16:56 skrev Andreas Schamanek via mailop: > > Could someone provide the old but apparently still valid IP addresses > so that we can configure DNS forwarding locally instead of disabling > the DNSBL? > Domain was updated ~21 minutes ago on 2021-01-31T16:04:06Z, now saying:    N