Re: [mailop] DMARC: Anyone using pct=n with n !=0 and n !=100?

> What do domain owners expect from an intermediate value of pct=? https://dmarcian.com/pct-tag/ So, if there are no issues - raise to 100 (or remove pct). Those who removed the DMARC record probably got more fail-reports than expected and panicked. __

Re: [mailop] SMTP AUTH harassment

On 2021-07-17 22:13, Slavko via mailop wrote: > Please, i want ask others if are these (mostly) Brasil attempts know to others too or am i "special" target? I've seen it for at least 16ish years, at work and on my personal servers. Mostly Brazil, South Korea, Turkey and Vietnam (+honourable

Re: [mailop] When RBLs go bad

> Have you guys already read this? https://blog.sucuri.net/2021/02/uceprotect-when-rbls-go-bad.html Interesting. I've never been able to find the mails reported by UCL in our logs when we've had something blocked. I've tried to

Re: [mailop] Some Days I think that Gmail isn't even trying to stop outbound spam..

On 2021-02-04 17:43, Luke via mailop wrote: Preventing outbound spam on a large system is a far greater challenge than stopping inbound spam. The technical challenges are similar, but the logistical challenges of preventing outbound spam without pissing off customers is /far/ greater than the c

Re: [mailop] Automatic abuse reports from Simply.com

On 1/15/21 11:21 AM, Stefano Bagnara via mailop wrote: Of course their server their rules, but I'd like to know if other abuse desks started receiving this kind of automated simply.com reports and what's your opinion about this practice. Hundreds... maybe about a thousand