Re: [mailop] Email Bounces

2023-11-16 Thread Marco via mailop
Am 16.11.2023 schrieb "Polath, Kiran via mailop" : > 550 5.1.0 ...@... sender rejected. Please see > https://www.spectrum.net/support/internet/{hash}-{hash} Does that page show something about the issue? ___ mailop mailing list

Re: [mailop] How to report abuse to cloudflare? Only via Web-Form?!? Phishing sites not against cloudflare policy!?!

2023-11-16 Thread Marco via mailop
Am 16.11.2023 schrieb Laura Atkins via mailop : > They protect a whole lot worse than phishing sites and have doxxed > people who complain about abuse. Is there a source for the latter? ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org

Re: [mailop] Microsoft lays hands on login data: Beware of the new Outlook

2023-11-10 Thread Marco via mailop
Am 10.11.2023 22:27 schrieb Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop: > Dnia 10.11.2023 o godz. 21:09:31 Louis Laureys via mailop pisze: > > You can probably tell from my wording how I feel about this. I get > > the battery efficiency part. Not the part where ActiveSync has an > > exception to it, and their own

Re: [mailop] IPv6 capable servers send with IPv4 to me

2023-10-06 Thread Marco via mailop
Am 06.10.2023 schrieb Stuart Henderson : > On 2023/10/06 13:08, Marco via mailop wrote: > > Am 06.10.2023 schrieb Bjørn Bürger via mailop : > > > > > 15 yrs ago I would have agreed to Wietse Venemas view, but > > > nowadays this kind of "solution&quo

Re: [mailop] IPv6 capable servers send with IPv4 to me

2023-10-06 Thread Marco via mailop
Am 06.10.2023 schrieb Bjørn Bürger via mailop : > 15 yrs ago I would have agreed to Wietse Venemas view, but nowadays > this kind of "solution" is just adding confusion and makes debugging > harder for everyone, unfortunately. And sadly it creates a comfortable solution for admins of

Re: [mailop] IPv6 capable servers send with IPv4 to me

2023-10-06 Thread Marco via mailop
Am 06.10.2023 schrieb Bjørn Bürger via mailop : > Some MTAs, like postfix for example, do load balancing across ip > protocols. I have no idea, why they think, this might be a good idea, > though. At least sendmail doesn't seem to do that. :-) I can understand very low timeouts for IPv6 and fast

Re: [mailop] IPv6 capable servers send with IPv4 to me

2023-10-06 Thread Marco via mailop
Am 06.10.2023 schrieb Stuart Henderson : > Networks single-homed behind cogent can't connect to networks > single-homed behind he.net and vice-versa. Is that related to PMTU-blackhole? Who is guilty for that? Why isn't that going to be fixed? ___

Re: [mailop] IPv6 capable servers send with IPv4 to me

2023-10-06 Thread Marco via mailop
Am 06.10.2023 schrieb Stuart Henderson : > On 2023/10/06 10:09, Marco via mailop wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I have an IPv6 and IPv4 accessible server, both protocols work and I > > receive mails with IPv6 too. > > Although, I see that certain IPv6 capable servers

[mailop] IPv6 capable servers send with IPv4 to me

2023-10-06 Thread Marco via mailop
Hello! I have an IPv6 and IPv4 accessible server, both protocols work and I receive mails with IPv6 too. Although, I see that certain IPv6 capable servers send with IPv4 in some cases. I am not aware of any outages and the strange things is it is rather random which protocol they use.

Re: [mailop] Recent increase in GMail 421-4.7.28 responses

2023-10-06 Thread Marco via mailop
Am 06.10.2023 schrieb Slavko via mailop : > Dňa 5. 10. o 9:58 Bernardo Reino via mailop napísal(a): > > > I have the same issue. Unfortunately there's a lot of servers which > > request DMARC reports, but then outright reject them (or use an > > invalid address). > > > > My list of