I have nearly the exact same setup and usage you do. I got the same deferral
when sending an email to <20 friends, of which about 15 were on Gmail. Exactly
the same results as you got.
Fortunately, I found I could schedule one recipient at a time (using opensmtpd)
and each message went
After 2 years, I’ve never seen anything but that message. I guess my 1-2
emails every other day isn’t enough to have any data (but sending one email to
13 recipients was an “unusual rate of unsolicited email” causing me to be rate
limited).
Sean
> On Dec 4, 2023, at 14:19, Randolf
My script has become more and more useless as more folks are using macros in
the spf lists which cannot be resolved (I.e, IP address of the connecting
server). :-(
Sean
Typed with my thumb.
> On Oct 30, 2023, at 12:16, Michael W. Lucas via mailop
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Trying to not
> On Aug 24, 2023, at 05:12, Chris Adams via mailop wrote:
>
> What do you do when legitimate mail is sent to the wrong address?
Various things:
* If it’s a valid reply-to, I reply and say “wrong person”.
* I try and find a way to contact the intended recipient.
* I try and contact the source
> On Aug 23, 2023, at 06:59, Doug McIntyre via mailop wrote:
> ...
>
> The Sendmail configuration is mostly a pattern match based setup. For
> back when there were 100's of different email system addressing ways,
> and 100s of gateways between them. If they had to only deal with the
> way
Grant,
Well put.
I was just going to link to Gilles Chehade’s post
(https://poolp.org/posts/2019-12-15/decentralised-smtp-is-for-the-greater-good/)
I don’t find running my own personal email server that hard or time consuming.
The most time consuming element being “keep OpenBSD updated”. :-)
> On Nov 21, 2022, at 18:29, John Levine via mailop wrote:
>
> I understand why that's the conventional wisdom, but I also don't
> understand why, if all the resources are on the same LAN as the name
> servers, the conventional wisdom would apply.
It’s nice to have mail queued instead of
