Hi
On 9/15/22 23:44, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) via mailop wrote:
* Does anyone have an OS using openssl 3.0 as the default rather than the
1.1 branch, that we can test the mainline branch on? (We don't want
access to your OS, just...to know which it is).
Ubuntu 22.04 LTS uses OpenSSL 3. See also:
Hi
On 5/30/22 13:17, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
The wording "access for less secure apps" suggests that removing this
feature makes the account more secure. In fact it's exactly the opposite -
the account becomes less secure. Why?
[…]
So which one is actually "more secure"??? :)
(Note: I
On 4/19/22 16:57, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote:
We just did 2 tests, one with an email that violated half a dozen best
practices and one that has a SPFSoftfail (with no DKIM).
I believe you accidentally pasted the same test twice, the headers look
100% identical to me.
Best regards
Tim Dü
Hi Lars,
On 11/2/21 2:19 PM, Lars Bornemann via mailop wrote:
We have the problem that our emails are generally marked as spam by STRATO
and are not delivered.
Therefore, our question to you, if you by chance have an abuse contact at
STRATO, which we can contact.
Thanks in advance :-)
I had
Hi Florian,
On 4/8/21 8:43 AM, florian.kun...@telekom.de wrote:
all this is about domains, not local parts
This sounds like it would break variable envelope return path
techniques, unless a mailing list replaces the 5322.from, needlessly
breaking a valid DKIM signature from the original sender
Hello,
[my first list post, please notify me if I break some etiquette]
On 4/6/21 3:48 PM, Florian.Kunkel--- via mailop wrote:
t-online.de is looking for full alignment between the SPF domain (5321.from)
AND the d=domain (DKIM) with the header from (5322.from).
ACK
t-online.de is rejecting
