It appears that Michael Orlitzky via mailop said:
>On 2024-08-09 15:11:45, Brotman, Alex via mailop wrote:
>> Yes, it should be updated.
>>
>> It might also be worth trying to get a bug filed against opendkim to update
>> docs or comments in the sample configuration file that is provided in the
AM
> To: mailop@mailop.org
> Subject: Re: [mailop] [EXTERNAL] Re: (Mis)use of DKIM's length tag and it's
> impact on DMARC and BIMI
>
> On 2024-08-09 15:11:45, Brotman, Alex via mailop wrote:
> > Yes, it should be updated.
> >
> > It might also be worth try
Michael Orlitzky via mailop skrev den 2024-08-10 16:03:
(the other, simpler sample config files don't mention the body length
option at all).
same problem here
https://certitude.consulting/blog/en/o365-anti-phishing-measures/
include another origin content into users browser, then all conte
On 2024-08-09 15:11:45, Brotman, Alex via mailop wrote:
> Yes, it should be updated.
>
> It might also be worth trying to get a bug filed against opendkim to update
> docs or comments in the sample configuration file that is provided in the
> package to illustrate suggested practices.
>
> (FWIW
Yes, it should be updated.
It might also be worth trying to get a bug filed against opendkim to update
docs or comments in the sample configuration file that is provided in the
package to illustrate suggested practices.
(FWIW, lists.debian.org still doesn't sign anything they send)
--
Alex Br
