Re: [mailop] FW: Did Google become stricter about RFC 5322?

2022-07-15 Thread John R Levine via mailop
2022 1:16 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Cc: m...@bacchusbrew.com Subject: Re: [mailop] FW: Did Google become stricter about RFC 5322? It appears that Michael Ellis via mailop said: Am I missing something as well? Google just rejected a client due to PTR on mailop-boun...@mailop.org but it s

Re: [mailop] FW: Did Google become stricter about RFC 5322?

2022-07-15 Thread Michael Ellis via mailop
this is correct. -Original Message- From: John Levine [mailto:jo...@taugh.com] Sent: July 15, 2022 1:16 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Cc: m...@bacchusbrew.com Subject: Re: [mailop] FW: Did Google become stricter about RFC 5322? It appears that Michael Ellis via mailop said: >Am I missing s

Re: [mailop] FW: Did Google become stricter about RFC 5322?

2022-07-15 Thread Slavko via mailop
Dňa 15. júla 2022 17:09:21 UTC používateľ Michael Ellis via mailop napísal: >Oops sorry apparently my cut and paste skills are lacking > >C:\Users\philipt>nslookup -q=ptr 173.160.100.85 >> >> Non-authoritative answer: >> >> 85.100.160.173.in-addr.arpa name = csc-emarketing.trimaxdirect.com >>

Re: [mailop] FW: Did Google become stricter about RFC 5322?

2022-07-15 Thread ml+mailop--- via mailop
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022, Michael Ellis via mailop wrote: > C:\Users\philipt>nslookup -q=mx csc-emarketing.trimaxdirect.com The MX record has nothing to do with this simple check. > 7/13/2022 11:12:35 AM Mail server: 550-5.7.25 [173.160.100.85] The IP > address sending this message does not have a

Re: [mailop] FW: Did Google become stricter about RFC 5322?

2022-07-15 Thread John Levine via mailop
It appears that Michael Ellis via mailop said: >Am I missing something as well? Google just rejected a client due to PTR on >mailop-boun...@mailop.org but it seems fine to me ... > Gmail, 550-5.7.1 this message has been blocked. Please review 550 >5.7.1 > RFC 5322 specifications for mor

Re: [mailop] FW: Did Google become stricter about RFC 5322?

2022-07-15 Thread Michael Ellis via mailop
mail does not accept > messages > > 550-5.7.25 from IPs with missing PTR records. Please visit > > 550-5.7.25 https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126#authentication > for more > > 550 5.7.25 information. > y19-20020a056602165300b0067badd50ba4si5526620iow.33 – gsmtp

Re: [mailop] FW: Did Google become stricter about RFC 5322?

2022-07-15 Thread ml+mailop--- via mailop
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022, Michael Ellis via mailop wrote: > Am I missing something as well? Google just rejected a client due to > PTR on mailop-boun...@mailop.org but it seems fine to me What is "PTR on mailop-boun...@mailop.org"? Can you post the rejection and the relevant logs? ___

[mailop] FW: Did Google become stricter about RFC 5322?

2022-07-15 Thread Michael Ellis via mailop
Am I missing something as well? Google just rejected a client due to PTR on mailop-boun...@mailop.org but it seems fine to me -Original Message- From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Philip Paeps via mailop Sent: July 13, 2022 3:31 AM To: mailop Subject: [mailop] D