On 6/28/24 11:00 AM, Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
If you want to trust me with the person's email address, I'll pass it to
a bunch of ESP deliverability/compliance people and ask them to unsub it
en masse, if they can. Some will and it might help. We've done it before
for others.
Thank you
If you want to trust me with the person's email address, I'll pass it to a
bunch of ESP deliverability/compliance people and ask them to unsub it en
masse, if they can. Some will and it might help. We've done it before for
others.
Cheers,
Al
--
Al Iverson // 312-725-0130 // Chicago
Adding to Taavi's List-Unsub condition - I've had similar success with
List-unsubscribe identification for transactional-volume attacks, and
also with a few additional indicators for transactional mail that are
below. These are Proofpoint-specific conditions, but can be (mostly)
translated to
The best method we've found was to reject all letters with
List-Unsubscribe header (or similar) sent to that victim.
This obviously has side-effects, but they're tolerable compared to the
flood of letters.
I should note that these letters are usually sent in order to cover up
something like
Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 02:35:16 +0100
schrieb Richard Clayton via mailop :
> this is "list bombing" and is done to simply annoy,
And also to attack other services, either by targeting the mailbox
itself (filling it to avoid receiving further mails) or their MX with
many, many messages.
Often, many
On 6/27/24 20:35, Richard Clayton via mailop wrote:
this is "list bombing" and is done to simply annoy, or more often to
hide some other message (about an unusual login, or money (or domain!)
transfer)
ACK
I didn't want to open a new thread with "bomb" in it.
some simple advice to a
In message <484dfe5a-71e7-4851-8de0-fe35342cff97@spamtrap.tnetconsulting
.net>, Grant Taylor via mailop writes
>Is there any value in contacting postmaster@ / abuse@ for senders that
>participated in a mass subscription bomb attack?
this is "list bombing" and is done to simply annoy, or more
Am Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:43:11 -0500
schrieb Grant Taylor via mailop :
> Is there any value in contacting postmaster@ / abuse@ for senders
> that participated in a mass subscription bomb attack?
Of course. They must be aware of that to implement countermeasures.
Some mailing list software has no
Hi,
Is there any value in contacting postmaster@ / abuse@ for senders that
participated in a mass subscription bomb attack?
I've got a user that received almost 1k subscription / welcome /
confirmation messages over a period of about 30 minutes before I
disabled the account (hopefully
