-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, 2017-03-11 at 19:19 -0500, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> I'm not saying they're not doing it: of course they are. I've done
> some manipulation of WHOIS and DNS records in order to track it, so
> I've got proof in hand. I'm sure others do as well.
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017, at 16:19, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 10:52:21AM +0800, ComKal Networks wrote:
> > I have noticed the scrapping of whois and dns records
> > appears to have increased dramatically over the past
> > 2 years.
>
> Both of those are poor sources of email addres
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 10:52:21AM +0800, ComKal Networks wrote:
> I have noticed the scrapping of whois and dns records
> appears to have increased dramatically over the past
> 2 years.
Both of those are poor sources of email addresses, though: the duplication
across many domains and the frequent
Hi Philip,
> Obviously I don't allow relaying without authentication but I hadn't
> realised spammers were now harvesting SPF records.
> Anyone else noticed this?
I have noticed the scrapping of whois and dns records
appears to have increased dramatically over the past
2 years.
Often when sel
I wonder if anyone else has noticed this. I have a mailserver listed as
a sender in the SPF records for a bunch of domains. It only sends mail,
it's not listed in any MX records.
A couple of days after adding this machine to SPF records, I'm seeing
many attempts in my maillogs from spammers tryi
