> Then maybe you use my opensource Apache jDKIM library? ;-)
It was a while ago (1,5 years). Can't remember (and I didn't code it myself
as I was preparing the company for an ISO 27k1 audit).
And while I am thinking about how clumsy these emails generally are,
describing the required DNS modificat
I think there were (as this was my previous employer) 2 or 3 support crew
per 1000 accounts.
And sure there were questions. But this would only escalate to me if the
technical dept. did not agree to the settings that were prefilled (e.g.
some customers simply demand 2048 bit DKIM). The advantage o
On 19 February 2018 at 12:24, David Hofstee wrote:
>>Using a return-path in the domain of your customer can be easy when
>>you have a multi-thousands-dollars contract for each customer. But
>>when you have "free" users or "few dollars per year" customers, you
>>can't afford manually helping people
>Using a return-path in the domain of your customer can be easy when
>you have a multi-thousands-dollars contract for each customer. But
>when you have "free" users or "few dollars per year" customers, you
>can't afford manually helping people to configure their domains so
>that you can use that in
On 2018-02-17 03:48, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Unfortunately there are still some server accepting everything and
sending bounces without headers or malformed bounces.
This is not a small group. Every few months I get massive floods of
bounces from some spambot that decided forging my domain is a
In article
you write:
>>>My 2cents: some ISPs require a manual registration based on the MAIL FROM
>>>email address (not just the domain name),
>>>hence VERP can't be used for them.
>>
>> Sounds like an excellent reason to get a less clueless ISP.
>>
>> Long before VERP, we had wildcard names li
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 11:28 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> On 17 February 2018 at 14:23, Benjamin BILLON wrote:
>> My 2cents: some ISPs require a manual registration based on the MAIL FROM
>> email address (not just the domain name), hence VERP can't be used for them.
>
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> Intere
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 11:19 AM, John Levine wrote:
> In article
>
> you write:
>>My 2cents: some ISPs require a manual registration based on the MAIL FROM
>>email address (not just the domain name),
>>hence VERP can't be used for them.
>
> Sounds like an excellent reason to get a less cluele
mailop.org] On Behalf Of Stefano Bagnara
> Sent: Saturday, 17 February, 2018 18:48
> To: mailop
> Subject: [mailop] VERP in 2018 (Was: RoadRunner Help?)
>
> On 17 February 2018 at 02:19, Michael Peddemors
> wrote:
>> [...]
>> And since the direction most MTA's go is to
e), hence VERP can't be used for them.
>
> --
> Benjamin Billon
>
> -Original Message-
> From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Stefano Bagnara
> Sent: Saturday, 17 February, 2018 18:48
> To: mailop
> Subject: [mailop] VERP in 20
In article
you write:
>My 2cents: some ISPs require a manual registration based on the MAIL FROM
>email address (not just the domain name),
>hence VERP can't be used for them.
Sounds like an excellent reason to get a less clueless ISP.
Long before VERP, we had wildcard names like joe+whate...
y, 17 February, 2018 18:48
To: mailop
Subject: [mailop] VERP in 2018 (Was: RoadRunner Help?)
On 17 February 2018 at 02:19, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> [...]
> And since the direction most MTA's go is to reduce any form of
> 'bounce' or backscatter, the idea of using the V
On 17 February 2018 at 02:19, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> [...]
> And since the direction most MTA's go is to reduce any form of 'bounce' or
> backscatter, the idea of using the VERP to detect 'bounces' is probably not
> as important as it once was, unless the emails are forwarded or client side
>
13 matches
Mail list logo