Hi guys,
thank you very much for all the input. Seems like SMTP proxies/smarthosts +
port 25 blocks/connection counting might be good for something.
However I really hope that breaking up TLS connections will never get a
routine practice. I mean we are fighting this for years now with all these
s
In article <1499809822.14353.11.ca...@ns.five-ten-sg.com> you write:
>> Doesn't matter -- the "transparent" filters force all of the
>> connections to the provider's filtering host, so if there's a TLS
>> connection, it terminates at the filtering host.
>
>That sort of proxy will break some of your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 19:50 +, John Levine wrote:
> Doesn't matter -- the "transparent" filters force all of the
> connections to the provider's filtering host, so if there's a TLS
> connection, it terminates at the filtering host.
That sort of
In article <9cdac510-4000-56f3-f919-8c5f1edaf...@schwarz.eu> you write:
>
>Am 10.07.2017 um 21:45 schrieb John Levine:
>> Many other hosting companies manage to control their spam. The usual
>> approach is to filter the mail their customers send, either with
>> "transparent" filters hijacking port
